Sardar Singh and Others Vs. the State of Haryana and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1121220
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided OnJan-16-2014
AppellantSardar Singh and Others
RespondentThe State of Haryana and Others
Excerpt:
cwp no.13553 & 16617 of 1990 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh (1) civil writ petition no.13553 of 1990 date of decision: january16 2014 sardar singh & others .....petitioners versus the state of haryana and others ....respondents (2) civil writ petition no.16617 of 1990 date of decision: january16 2014 sunder singh .....petitioners versus the secretary to govt. of haryana and others ....respondents coram:- hon'ble mr.justice augustine george masih1 whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?. 2. to be referred to the reporters or not?. 3. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. present: none for the petitioners.mr.aman chaudhary, addl. a.g., haryana, for the state. ***** augustine george masih, j. (oral) by this order, i proposed to dispose of two writ petition nos.13553 and 16617 of 1990. today, when the connected case i.e.cwp no.12279 of 1990, titled as “fateh singh versus the state of haryana & others”. was taken up for hearing, counsel for the state had produced a communication dated harish kumar 2014.01.20 10:40 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document cwp no.13553 & 16617 of 1990 -2- 20.11.2013 in which the claim of the petitioner in the said writ petition was considered by the respondents in the light of judgment passed by this court in cwp no.15792 of 1990, titled as “risal singh & others versus state of haryana & others”. decided on 08.01.1993. petitioners in that writ petition were granted the benefits in the said judgment. the claim of the petitioners in these two petitions also appear to be covered by the judgment in risal singh & others.case (supra) and, therefore, a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the claims of the petitioners in the light of this judgment and if the same is found to be covered, consequential relief, if already not granted to them, be released to them within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order. petitions stand disposed of. registry is directed to send the copy of the order to the respondents for compliance as well as to the petitioners.january 16, 2014 ( augustine george masih ) harish judge harish kumar 2014.01.20 10:40 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Judgment:

CWP No.13553 & 16617 of 1990 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (1) CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.13553 of 1990 DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY16 2014 Sardar Singh & others .....Petitioners VERSUS The State of Haryana and others ....Respondents (2) CIVIL WRIT PETITION No.16617 of 1990 DATE OF DECISION: JANUARY16 2014 Sunder Singh .....Petitioners VERSUS The Secretary to Govt.

of Haryana and others ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?.

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not?.

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?.

Present: None for the petitioneRs.Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Addl.

A.G., Haryana, for the State.

***** AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J.

(ORAL) By this order, I proposed to dispose of two writ petition Nos.13553 and 16617 of 1990.

Today, when the connected case i.e.CWP No.12279 of 1990, titled as “Fateh Singh versus The State of Haryana & others”.

was taken up for hearing, counsel for the State had produced a communication dated Harish Kumar 2014.01.20 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.13553 & 16617 of 1990 -2- 20.11.2013 in which the claim of the petitioner in the said writ petition was considered by the respondents in the light of judgment passed by this Court in CWP No.15792 of 1990, titled as “Risal Singh & others versus State of Haryana & others”.

decided on 08.01.1993.

Petitioners in that writ petition were granted the benefits in the said judgment.

The claim of the petitioners in these two petitions also appear to be covered by the judgment in Risal Singh & otheRs.case (supra) and, therefore, a direction is issued to the respondents to consider the claims of the petitioners in the light of this judgment and if the same is found to be covered, consequential relief, if already not granted to them, be released to them within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of the order.

Petitions stand disposed of.

Registry is directed to send the copy of the order to the respondents for compliance as well as to the petitioneRs.January 16, 2014 ( AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH ) Harish JUDGE Harish Kumar 2014.01.20 10:40 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document