Shaym Sunder Dhingra, Sole Proprietor Vs. M/S Panchranga Foods and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1117824
CourtIntellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided OnOct-27-2009
Case NumberTRA/115 of 2004/TM/DEL (C.O.5 of 2003)
JudgeHONOURABLE Z.S NEGI CHAIRMAN & HONOURABLE SYED OBAIDUR RAHAMAN TECHNICAL MEMBER
AppellantShaym Sunder Dhingra, Sole Proprietor
RespondentM/S Panchranga Foods and Another
Excerpt:
(circuit bench sitting at delhi) order (no.189/2009) z. s. negi, chairman: when the case was called today there was no representation from either side. during the last date of hearing also there was no representation from both the sides. registry was directed to send fresh notices to the applicant and the respondents for todays hearing. it appears from the records that the notices have been served on the counsel for the applicant (m/s k.g.bansal and co.) and on the respondent no.2. therefore, in terms of rule 17 of the intellectual property appellate board (procedure) rules, 2003, the rectification application is treated as abandoned.
Judgment:

(Circuit Bench Sitting at Delhi)

ORDER (No.189/2009)

Z. S. Negi, Chairman:

When the case was called today there was no representation from either side. During the last date of hearing also there was no representation from both the sides. Registry was directed to send fresh notices to the applicant and the respondents for todays hearing. It appears from the records that the notices have been served on the counsel for the applicant (M/s K.G.Bansal and Co.) and on the respondent No.2. Therefore, in terms of rule 17 of the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003, the rectification application is treated as abandoned.