Vermont Vs. Cox - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/106328
SubjectLand Acquisition
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnDec-14-1987
Case Number484 U.S. 173
AppellantVermont
RespondentCox
Excerpt:
vermont v. cox - 484 u.s. 173 (1987) u.s. supreme court vermont v. cox, 484 u.s. 173 (1987) 484 u.s. 173 vermont v. cox certiorari to the supreme court of vermont no. 86-1108. argued november 3, 1987 decided december 14, 1987 certiorari dismissed. reported below: 147 vt. 421, 519 a. 2d 1144. susan r. harritt, assistant attorney general of vermont, argued the cause for petitioner. with her on the briefs were jeffrey l. amestoy, attorney general, and joanna a. mauer, assistant attorney general. paul j. larkin, jr., argued the cause for the united states as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. on the brief were solicitor general fried, assistant attorney general weld, deputy solicitor general bryson, harriet s. shapiro, and kathleen a. felton. henry hinton, by invitation of the court, 481 u.s. 1012, argued the cause as amicus curiae in support of the judgment below. with him on the brief was william a. nelson. per curiam. the writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 484 u.s. 173, 174
Judgment:
VERMONT v. COX - 484 U.S. 173 (1987)
U.S. Supreme Court VERMONT v. COX, 484 U.S. 173 (1987) 484 U.S. 173

VERMONT v. COX
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF VERMONT

No. 86-1108.

Argued November 3, 1987
Decided December 14, 1987

Certiorari dismissed.

Reported below: 147 Vt. 421, 519 A. 2d 1144.

Susan R. Harritt, Assistant Attorney General of Vermont, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Jeffrey L. Amestoy, Attorney General, and Joanna A. Mauer, Assistant Attorney General.

Paul J. Larkin, Jr., argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. On the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Weld, Deputy Solicitor General Bryson, Harriet S. Shapiro, and Kathleen A. Felton.

Henry Hinton, by invitation of the Court, 481 U.S. 1012, argued the cause as amicus curiae in support of the judgment below. With him on the brief was William A. Nelson.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 484 U.S. 173, 174