Ramswaroop Sahu Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1052088
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnFeb-27-2013
AppellantRamswaroop Sahu
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Excerpt:
ramswaroop sahu versus state of m.p.& others writ petition no.2902 ”13. 2.2013: shri atul chaudhari, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri samdarshi tiwari, learned government advocate for the state. against the impugned order passed by tehsildar rejecting preliminary objection of petitioner in the proceedings being held for mutation, petitioner has remedy to file firs.appeal, second appeal under section 44 and revision under section 50 of the m.p.land revenue act, therefore, a petition directly before this court, by-passing the three tier statutory remedy available, is not permissible. accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recours.of statutory remedy available, this petition is disposed of. (rajendra menon) judge ss/-
Judgment:

Ramswaroop Sahu versus State of M.P.& Others Writ Petition No.2902 ”

13. 2.2013: Shri Atul Chaudhari, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Samdarshi Tiwari, learned Government Advocate for the State.

Against the impugned order passed by Tehsildar rejecting preliminary objection of petitioner in the proceedings being held for mutation, petitioner has remedy to file FiRs.Appeal, Second Appeal under Section 44 and Revision under Section 50 of the M.P.Land Revenue Act, therefore, a petition directly before this Court, by-passing the three tier statutory remedy available, is not permissible.

Accordingly, granting liberty to the petitioner to take recouRs.of statutory remedy available, this petition is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon) Judge ss/-