Devkaran Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1043603
SubjectEducation
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided OnApr-29-2013
AppellantDevkaran
RespondentThe State of Madhya Pradesh
Appellant AdvocateShri. Abdul Waheed Choudhary
Respondent AdvocateShri. Avinash Zargar
Excerpt:
1 w.p.no.14658/2011 29/4/2013: shri abdul waheed choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner. shri avinash zargar, learned counsel for the respondents. challenging an interlocutory order dated 2.8.2011 by which stamp duty is directed to be paid on registered sale deed dated 10.6.1954, petitioner has filed this writ petition under article 227 of the constitution. the court on the ground that the document is not admissible in evidence has refused to take the document on record, apart from the fact that the document does not bear sufficient stamp. nothing is brought on record on the basis of which the findings recorded by the court below can be termed as pervers.or illegal warranting interference in this petition. accordingly, finding no case for interference, petition is dismissed. ( rajendra meno.) judge mrs.mishra
Judgment:

1 W.P.No.14658/2011 29/4/2013: Shri Abdul Waheed Choudhary, learned counsel for the petitioner.

Shri Avinash Zargar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Challenging an interlocutory order dated 2.8.2011 by which stamp duty is directed to be paid on registered sale deed dated 10.6.1954, petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The Court on the ground that the document is not admissible in evidence has refused to take the document on record, apart from the fact that the document does not bear sufficient stamp.

Nothing is brought on record on the basis of which the findings recorded by the Court below can be termed as perveRs.or illegal warranting interference in this petition.

Accordingly, finding no case for interference, petition is dismissed.

( Rajendra MeNo.) Judge Mrs.mishra