Hackney Vs. Machado - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/102694
SubjectLand Acquisition
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On1970
Case Number397 U.S. 593
AppellantHackney
RespondentMachado
Excerpt:
hackney v. machado - 397 u.s. 593 (1970) u.s. supreme court hackney v. machado , 397 u.s. 593 (1970) 397 u.s. 593 burton g. hackney, commissioner of public welfare of texas, et al. v. margarita machado et al. no. 553. supreme court of the united states april 20, 1970 crawford c. martin, atty. gen. of texas, nola white, first asst. atty. gen., hawthorne phillips, executive asst. atty. gen., and j. c. davis and john h. banks, asst. attys. gen., for appellants. c. stanley banks, jr., for appellees. per curiam. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration in light of goldberg v. kelly, 397 u.s. 254 . the chief justice, mr. justice black, and mr. justice stewart dissent.[ hackney v. machado 397 u.s. 593 (1970) ]
Judgment:
HACKNEY v. MACHADO - 397 U.S. 593 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court HACKNEY v. MACHADO , 397 U.S. 593 (1970)

397 U.S. 593

Burton G. HACKNEY, Commissioner of Public Welfare of Texas, et al.
v.
Margarita MACHADO et al.
No. 553.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 20, 1970

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Nola White, First Asst. Atty. Gen., Hawthorne Phillips, Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. C. Davis and John H. Banks, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

C. Stanley Banks, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Mr. Justice BLACK, and Mr. Justice STEWART dissent.[ Hackney v. Machado 397 U.S. 593 (1970) ]