SteIn Vs. Luken - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/102654
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnFeb-02-1970
Case Number396 U.S. 555
AppellantStein
RespondentLuken
Excerpt:
stein v. luken - 396 u.s. 555 (1970) u.s. supreme court stein v. luken, 396 u.s. 555 (1970) 396 u.s. 555 stein v. luken et al. appeal from the supreme court of illinois no. 854. decided february 2, 1970 appeal dismissed. yale stein, appellant, pro se. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by rule 13. providence & worcester co. v. united states, 396 u.s. 555 (1970) 396 u.s. 555 (1970) "> u.s. supreme court providence & worcester co. v. united states, 396 u.s. 555 (1970) 396 u.s. 555 providence & worcester co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the southern district of new york no. 919. decided february 2, 1970 300 f. supp. 185, affirmed. harold i. meyerson for appellant. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general mclaren, deputy solicitor general springer, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane, and leonard s. goodman for appellees the united states et al. per curiam. the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. page 396 u.s. 555, 556
Judgment:
STEIN v. LUKEN - 396 U.S. 555 (1970)
U.S. Supreme Court STEIN v. LUKEN, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

STEIN v. LUKEN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
No. 854.
Decided February 2, 1970

Appeal dismissed.

Yale Stein, appellant, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for failure to docket the case within the time prescribed by Rule 13.

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a> 396 U.S. 555 </a> (1970) 396 U.S. 555 (1970) "> U.S. Supreme Court PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES, 396 U.S. 555 (1970) 396 U.S. 555

PROVIDENCE & WORCESTER CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
NEW YORK No. 919.
Decided February 2, 1970

300 F. Supp. 185, affirmed.

Harold I. Meyerson for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Deputy Solicitor General Springer, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane, and Leonard S. Goodman for appellees the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 396 U.S. 555, 556