Dharmendra Kumar Singh Vs. Ms Bharat Coking Coal Ltd Through Its C M D and ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1024933
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-23-2013
AppellantDharmendra Kumar Singh
RespondentMs Bharat Coking Coal Ltd Through Its C M D and ors
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s). no. 6994 of 2012 with w.p.(s). no. 350 of 2013 dharmendra kumar singh .... petitioner( in both cases) versus m/s bharat coking coal ltd. & others ..... respondents(in both cases) ---------- coram: honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner : mr. sanjay kumar sinha for the respondents : mr. ananda sen 02/23.08.2013 heard counsel for the parties. learned counsel for the petitioner after seeking instruction from his client submitted that petitioner has already submitted his joining on the subsequent transferred place of posting at bararee colliery from lodna colliery under the notification dated 10.10.2012. the aforesaid notification of his transfer to bararee colliery is under challenge in w.p.s. no. 350 of 2013. petitioner had earlier preferred writ petition being w.p.s. no. 6994 of 2012 challenging the earlier order of transfer dated 30.10.2012 from joyrampur colliery to lodna colliery. since, the petitioner has already submitted his joining at bararee colliery upon the subsequent notification dated 10.10.2012, therefore the cause of action raised by the petitioner in the instant writ petitions have now been rendered infructuous. accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) a. mohanty
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6994 of 2012 with W.P.(S). No. 350 of 2013 Dharmendra Kumar Singh .... Petitioner( in both cases) Versus M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. & others ..... Respondents(in both cases) ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen 02/23.08.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner after seeking instruction from his client submitted that petitioner has already submitted his joining on the subsequent transferred place of posting at Bararee Colliery from Lodna Colliery under the notification dated 10.10.2012. The aforesaid notification of his transfer to Bararee Colliery is under challenge in W.P.S. No. 350 of 2013. Petitioner had earlier preferred writ petition being W.P.S. No. 6994 of 2012 challenging the earlier order of transfer dated 30.10.2012 from Joyrampur colliery to Lodna Colliery. Since, the petitioner has already submitted his joining at Bararee Colliery upon the subsequent notification dated 10.10.2012, therefore the cause of action raised by the petitioner in the instant writ petitions have now been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty