Mamta Bajpayee Vs. Phool Kumari Devi and anr - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1024926
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-23-2013
AppellantMamta Bajpayee
RespondentPhool Kumari Devi and anr
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi c.m.p. no. 186 of 2013 mamta bajpayee ..petitioner versus phool kumari devi & others .opposite parties ----- coram:honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari for the petitioner : miss. warda khan, advocate for the opposite parties : mrs. gauri devi, advocate ---- 04/23-08-2013 it has been submitted that in spite of the clear direction of this court dated 3.4.2013, passed in c.m.p. no. 135 of 2013, s.a. no. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of. on perusal of the order, i find that there was a clear direction of this court to dispose of s.a. no. 02 of 2012 up to 13th may, 2013 but it has been informed that said direction has not been complied with and s.a. no. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of till date. call for a report from the presiding officer, debt recovery tribunal, ranchi (opposite party no.4) regarding the present status of the said s.a., so that appropriate order for the alleged non- compliance of the order be passed. put up this case on 13th september, 2013. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) rakesh/
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 186 of 2013 Mamta Bajpayee ..Petitioner Versus Phool Kumari Devi & Others .Opposite Parties ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Miss. Warda Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mrs. Gauri Devi, Advocate ---- 04/23-08-2013 It has been submitted that in spite of the clear direction of this Court dated 3.4.2013, passed in C.M.P. No. 135 of 2013, S.A. No. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of. On perusal of the order, I find that there was a clear direction of this Court to dispose of S.A. No. 02 of 2012 up to 13th May, 2013 but it has been informed that said direction has not been complied with and S.A. No. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of till date. Call for a report from the Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi (Opposite party no.

4) regarding the present status of the said S.A., so that appropriate order for the alleged non- compliance of the order be passed. Put up this case on 13th September, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/