Kishor Jojo Vs. State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1024847
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-26-2013
AppellantKishor Jojo
RespondentState of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi cr.appeal(db)no.391of2013 kishorjojo .......appellant versus thestateofjharkhand .....respondent coram: honbletheactingchiefjustice honblemr.justiceshreechandrashekhar. fortheappellant :mr.s.k.deo,advocate forthestate:mr.h.k.shikarwar,a.p.p. 04/dated:26 th august,2013 oralorder: perd.n.patel,j.:1. thisappealhasbeenadmittedvideorderdated29thjuly,2013and therecordandproceedingsofsessionstrialno.93of2006wascalled fromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatetheargumentsforsuspensionof sentence.thiscourthasreceivedtherecordandproceedingsofthetrial courtandwehaveperusedthesame.2. havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtotheevidences on record, it appears that there is a prima facie case in favour of this appellant.asthecriminalappealispending,wearenotmuchanalyzing theevidencesonrecord,but,sufficeittosaythatlookingtothedepositions ofp.w.1,p.w.2,p.w.3andp.w.4,thereisaprimafaciecaseinfavourofthis appellant.thereisnoeyewitnessoftheincidentnorthewitnessnamely, rathunarayansinghhasbeenexaminedbecausehehadalreadyexpired. thiswitnesswasinthecompanyofthedeceased.3. inviewofthesefactsandalsolookingtotheevidencesonrecord,we hereby, suspend the sentence awarded by the trial court to the present appellant. during pendency of this appeal,the appellant namely, kishor jojo,isdirectedtobereleasedonbailuponexecutingbondofrs.10,000/ (rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfactionoftheadditionalsessionsjudge,f.t.c.,simdega,inconnection withsessionstrialno.93of2006,ontheconditionthattheappellantshall beavailableasandwhenhispresenceisrequiredbythecourt. (d.n.patel,j) (shreechandrashekhar,j.) vk/
Judgment:

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.391of2013 KishorJojo .......Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand .....Respondent CORAM: HONBLETHEACTINGCHIEFJUSTICE HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellant :Mr.S.K.Deo,Advocate FortheState:Mr.H.K.Shikarwar,A.P.P. 04/Dated:26 th August,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,J.:

1. ThisappealhasbeenAdmittedvideorderdated29thJuly,2013and therecordandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo.93of2006wascalled fromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatetheargumentsforsuspensionof sentence.ThisCourthasreceivedtherecordandproceedingsofthetrial courtandwehaveperusedthesame.

2. Havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtotheevidences on record, it appears that there is a prima facie case in favour of this appellant.Asthecriminalappealispending,wearenotmuchanalyzing theevidencesonrecord,but,sufficeittosaythatlookingtothedepositions ofP.W.1,P.W.2,P.W.3andP.W.4,thereisaprimafaciecaseinfavourofthis appellant.Thereisnoeyewitnessoftheincidentnorthewitnessnamely, RathuNarayanSinghhasbeenexaminedbecausehehadalreadyexpired. Thiswitnesswasinthecompanyofthedeceased.

3. Inviewofthesefactsandalsolookingtotheevidencesonrecord,we hereby, suspend the sentence awarded by the trial court to the present appellant. During pendency of this appeal,the appellant namely, Kishor Jojo,isdirectedtobereleasedonbailuponexecutingbondofRs.10,000/ (Rs. ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfactionoftheAdditionalSessionsJudge,F.T.C.,Simdega,inconnection withSessionsTrialNo.93of2006,ontheconditionthattheappellantshall beavailableasandwhenhispresenceisrequiredbythecourt. (D.N.Patel,J) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) VK/