Chance Vs. California - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/101560
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnNov-06-1967
Case Number389 U.S. 89
AppellantChance
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
chance v. california - 389 u.s. 89 (1967) u.s. supreme court chance v. california, 389 u.s. 89 (1967) 389 u.s. 89 chance v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the superior court of california, county of san mateo. no. 306, misc. decided november 6, 1967. certiorari granted; judgment reversed. marshall w. krause for petitioner. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, and robert r. granucci and michael j. phelan, deputy attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . mr. justice harlan would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 . page 389 u.s. 89, 90
Judgment:
CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA - 389 U.S. 89 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 89 (1967) 389 U.S. 89

CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. No. 306, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1967.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Marshall W. Krause for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Michael J. Phelan, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 .

Page 389 U.S. 89, 90