Surendra Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1008737
SubjectCriminal
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnJul-31-2013
AppellantSurendra Sahu
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a no. 5535 of 2013 ------- surendra sahu . petitioner -versus- the state of jharkhand ..... opposite party ------- coram : honble mr. justice h.c.mishra ------- for the petitioner : : m/s. pandey neeraj rai for the state : : mr. a.p.p. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the state. the petitioner has been made accused in connection with tatisilway p.s. case no. 32 of 2013, corresponding to g.r. no. 2066 of 2013, for the offence under sections 498-a of the indian penal code and sections 3/ 4 of the dowry prohibition act. there is allegation against the petitioner to have subjected his wife to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, surendra sahu, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of sri prakash jha, learned judicial magistrate, ranchi, or his successor, in connection with, tatisilway p.s. case no. 32 of 2013, corresponding to g.r. no. 2066 of 2013 (h.c.mishra, j.) d.s.
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5535 of 2013 ------- Surendra Sahu . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------- For the Petitioner : : M/s. Pandey Neeraj Rai For the State : : Mr. A.P.P. ------- 2/ 31.07.2013. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 32 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 2066 of 2013, for the offence under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. There is allegation against the petitioner to have subjected his wife to cruelty and torture for demand of dowry. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, Surendra Sahu, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Prakash Jha, learned Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi, or his successor, in connection with, Tatisilway P.S. Case No. 32 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 2066 of 2013 (H.C.Mishra, J.) D.S.