Dr Nagendra Prasad Singh Alias Nagendra Prasad Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/1007866
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnJul-25-2013
AppellantDr Nagendra Prasad Singh Alias Nagendra Prasad Singh
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand and anr
Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.2286of2013 dr.nagendraprasadsingh@nagendraprasadsingh petitioner versus 1.thestateofjharkhand 2.harinarayanmishra oppositeparties coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.manishkumar,advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 03/25.07.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. itrevealsfromthecomplaintthatthecomplainanthadadvancedloanof rs.2lacstothepetitioner.inordertorepaytheloanamountthepetitionerhad issuedfewchequesbutthosechequesstooddishonoured.itisallegedthatthe petitionerwithhishenchmanhadthreatenedthecomplainantandhencethis case. itissubmittedthatentirecomplaintisconcoctedandrealfactshavebeen suppressedbythecomplainant.evenifentireallegationistakentobetrue,no case under section 384 i.p.c. is made out against the petitioner and other offencesarebailableinnature. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. consideringfactsandcircumstances,abovenamedpetitionerisdirected tosurrenderbeforethecourtbelowwithinaperiodofthreeweeksfromtoday andonsuchsurrenderheisdirectedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingbail bond of rs.10,000/(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amounteachtothesatisfactionofthecourtofsriarvindkumar,learnedj.m. 1st class,bokaroinconnectionwithc.p.caseno.390of2011subjecttothe conditionslaiddownundersection438(2)cr.p.c. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc
Judgment:

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2286of2013 Dr.NagendraPrasadSingh@NagendraPrasadSingh Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.HariNarayanMishra OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.ManishKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 03/25.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. Itrevealsfromthecomplaintthatthecomplainanthadadvancedloanof Rs.2lacstothepetitioner.Inordertorepaytheloanamountthepetitionerhad issuedfewchequesbutthosechequesstooddishonoured.Itisallegedthatthe petitionerwithhishenchmanhadthreatenedthecomplainantandhencethis case. Itissubmittedthatentirecomplaintisconcoctedandrealfactshavebeen suppressedbythecomplainant.Evenifentireallegationistakentobetrue,no case under Section 384 I.P.C. is made out against the petitioner and other offencesarebailableinnature. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringfactsandcircumstances,abovenamedpetitionerisdirected tosurrenderbeforetheCourtbelowwithinaperiodofthreeweeksfromtoday andonsuchsurrenderheisdirectedtobereleasedonbailonfurnishingbail bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amounteachtothesatisfactionoftheCourtofSriArvindKumar,learnedJ.M. 1st Class,BokaroinconnectionwithC.P.CaseNo.390of2011subjecttothe conditionslaiddownunderSection438(2)Cr.P.C. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC