| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/1007803 |
| Subject | Criminal |
| Court | Jharkhand High Court |
| Decided On | Jul-25-2013 |
| Appellant | Santosh Kumar |
| Respondent | The State of Jharkhand |
Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.5620of2013 santoshkumar petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.umeshkumarchoubey,advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 02/25.07.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. it reveals that petitioner has been prosecuted for causing torture and treatingtheinformantwithcrueltyforwantofmoredowry. itisalsoalleged that the informant was subjected to assault by the petitioner while she was pregnant. itissubmittedthatthiscasehasbeenlodgedbecausepetitionerhadgone todelhitoworkandhewasnotinapositiontokeepthecomplainantwithhim atdelhi.heisincustodysincelastfourmonths. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. considering matrimonial nature of the offence as well as period of detention of petitioner in custody, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand)withtwosuretiesof thelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthecourtofmiss.divyamishra, learned judicial magistrate 1st class, hazaribagh in connection with mahila (sadar)p.s.caseno.06of2013correspondingtog.r.caseno.360of2013. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc
Judgment:INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5620of2013 SantoshKumar Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.UmeshKumarChoubey,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/25.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. It reveals that petitioner has been prosecuted for causing torture and treatingtheinformantwithcrueltyforwantofmoredowry. Itisalsoalleged that the informant was subjected to assault by the petitioner while she was pregnant. Itissubmittedthatthiscasehasbeenlodgedbecausepetitionerhadgone toDelhitoworkandhewasnotinapositiontokeepthecomplainantwithhim atDelhi.Heisincustodysincelastfourmonths. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Considering matrimonial nature of the offence as well as period of detention of petitioner in custody, he is directed to be released on bail on furnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)withtwosuretiesof thelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionoftheCourtofMiss.DivyaMishra, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Mahila (Sadar)P.S.CaseNo.06of2013correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.360of2013. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC