Roller Bearing - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: roller bearing Page 1 of about 7 results (0.024 seconds)Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1984)(17)ELT469TriDel
point at issue in the two appeals is whether needle roller cages manufactured by the appellants fall under Item 49 or which included cage and cage assembly as sub-units of the bearing. They produced their catalogue and a few invoices to show
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTimken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
that there will be no dominant individual in the tapered roller bearing field. The American company had had a normal growth and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of antifriction bearings. The District Court found that, under agreements between them the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTimken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. Pennsylvania R. Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 274 U.S. 181 (1927) Timken Roller Bearing Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company Nos. 168, 178 Argued - 274 U.S. 181 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 274 U.S. 181 (1927) Timken
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeedle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (1997)LC350Tri(Delhi)
as to obtain the best results while checking the needle roller bearing components. They further informed us that throughout the world machine for checking the surface of a precision product like bearings. It was pleaded before us that defects like grinding marks,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTimken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. Pennsylvania R Co
Court: US Supreme Court
, 47 S. Ct. 550, 71 L. Ed. -.[ Timken Roller Bearing Co v. Pennsylvania R Co 273 U.S. 665 (1927) CO, 273 U.S. 665 (1927) 273 U.S. 665 TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,* and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeedle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1946.2. M/s. Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd., Thane, (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1946.2. M/s. Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd., Thane, (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) holding
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeedle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Reported in: (1999)(80)LC618Tri(Mum.)bai
of Rs. 2.5 lakhs.2. Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of roller bearings, was filing price lists from time to time and Rs. 2.5 lakhs.2. Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of roller bearings, was filing price lists from time to time and clearing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>