Skip to content


Roller Bearing - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: roller bearing Page 1 of about 7 results (0.024 seconds)
Mar 12 1984 (TRI)

Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1984)(17)ELT469TriDel

point at issue in the two appeals is whether needle roller cages manufactured by the appellants fall under Item 49 or which included cage and cage assembly as sub-units of the bearing. They produced their catalogue and a few invoices to show

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 04 1951 (FN)

Timken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

that there will be no dominant individual in the tapered roller bearing field. The American company had had a normal growth and foreign commerce in the manufacture and sale of antifriction bearings. The District Court found that, under agreements between them the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 1927 (FN)

Timken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. Pennsylvania R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 274 U.S. 181 (1927) Timken Roller Bearing Company v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company Nos. 168, 178 Argued - 274 U.S. 181 (1927) U.S. Supreme Court Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 274 U.S. 181 (1927) Timken

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 1996 (TRI)

Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1997)LC350Tri(Delhi)

as to obtain the best results while checking the needle roller bearing components. They further informed us that throughout the world machine for checking the surface of a precision product like bearings. It was pleaded before us that defects like grinding marks,

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1927

Timken Roller Bearing Co. Vs. Pennsylvania R Co

Court: US Supreme Court

, 47 S. Ct. 550, 71 L. Ed. -.[ Timken Roller Bearing Co v. Pennsylvania R Co 273 U.S. 665 (1927) CO, 273 U.S. 665 (1927) 273 U.S. 665 TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING COMPANY, plaintiff in error, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,* and

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2004 (TRI)

Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1946.2. M/s. Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd., Thane, (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1946.2. M/s. Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd., Thane, (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) holding

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 20 1998 (TRI)

Needle Roller Bearing Co. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1999)(80)LC618Tri(Mum.)bai

of Rs. 2.5 lakhs.2. Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of roller bearings, was filing price lists from time to time and Rs. 2.5 lakhs.2. Appellant, engaged in the manufacture of roller bearings, was filing price lists from time to time and clearing

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //