Excise Officer - Judgment Search Results

District Excise Officer and ors. Vs. Smt. Kalawati Hari Singh Choudhar ...

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001(4)WLC60; 2007(2)WLN472

found that as per circular dated 8.10.1998 issued by the Excise department (defendant) it did not exclude civil court's jurisdiction to the Excise Commissioner from any order passed by an Excise Officer under the Excise Act and (b) to the Divisional Commissioner

District Excise Officer, Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

The assessee as contemplated in s. 246(1)(a) is not District Excise Officer who is a person collecting the purchase price and assessee as contemplated in s. 246(1)(a) is not District Excise Officer who is a person collecting the purchase price and then

District Excise Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2001)68TTJ(Del)436

The assessed as contemplated in section 246(1)(a) is not District Excise Officer who is a person collecting the purchase price and defined in section covers individual, HUF, company, a firm, assessing officer Personal, local authority and every artificial juridical person.'''Assessment : Assessment

District Excise Officer, Vs. Income Tax Officer (ito V. Distt.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)66ITD168(Delhi)

Furthermore, whether the order of the AO in directing the Excise & Taxation Officer to pay the tax is not the the party in detail, he held that the District Excise Officer had failed to collect tax at source and to pay

District Excise Officer Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)61TTJ(Delhi)770

addition. This has also been so understood by the District Excise & Taxation Officer who has denied this liability in an the party in detail, he held that the District Excise Officer had failed to collect tax at source and to pay

District Excise Officer Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

of appeal for the assessment year 1994-95 by the District Excise Officer, Saharanpur, are as under : "1. That, on the and 379/DeIhi of 1997 in the case of District Excise Officer, .Dehradun, wherein it is held that the provisions of Section

Commissioner of Income-tax and anr. Vs. District Excise Officer

Court: Uttaranchal

Reported in: [2006]284ITR22(Uttaranchal)

of shops during the excise year or part of the excise year for which he has obtained the licence, so however, to the show cause notice issued to the District Excise Officer, he contended before the ITO (TDS) that in accordance with

Mangilal Vs. District Excise Officer, Ajmer and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1971Raj46; 1970(3)WLN159

condition No. 6 of the license and, therefore, the District Excise Officer thought it advisable to suspend the petitioner's license. He the power of suspension which is used against the delinquent officers during the course of the disciplinary enquiry against them.13. Mr.

Lakshmi NaraIn and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. District Excise Officer, Fatehpu ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1476; [1979]1SCR161

different but in pari materia. Section 41(e)(v) of the U.P. Excise Act empowers the Excise Commissioner to make rules fixing the

Pon Ayyavoo Vs. the Taluk Excise Officer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1984)2MLJ147

and 18/1-B of the same village as alternate sites. The excise authorities rejected all the sites on the ground that all