Skip to content


By Wash - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: by wash Page 1 of about 13 results (0.017 seconds)
1873

Washing Machine Company Vs. Tool Company

Court: US Supreme Court

adapted to secure the standard to the sides of a wash tub. Unless, therefore, the U form of the yoke frame

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1918 (FN)

Grinnell Washing Machine Co. Vs. E. E. Johnson Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

safety of the operator may require. These things, the simultaneous washing and wringing with the operation of the control handle for

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1877

Gold Washing and Water Company Vs. Keyes

Court: US Supreme Court

Gold Washing & Water Company v. Keyes - 96 U.S. 199 (1877)

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 26 1984 (FN)

Wash. Metro. Area Transit Vs. Johnson

Court: US Supreme Court

Wash. Metro. Area Transit v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 925 (1984) Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Johnson No. 83-747 Argued April

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 2007 (TRI)

Quick Car Wash Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)(118)ECC233

Metal Rest, imported from Kallweit, Germany by M/s. Quick Car Wash Pvt. Ltd. Jalandhar vide Invoice No. 59379 dated 19.11.01. After

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 26 1998 (HC)

Magic Wash Industries (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Asst. Provident Fund Commi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1999(82)FLR772]; (1999)IILLJ792Bom

R.K. Batta, J. 1. Petitioner 1 is registered as a Small Scale Industrial Unit with the Directorate of Industries and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 1987 (FN)

Tyler Pipe Vs. Wash. Dept. of Rev.

Court: US Supreme Court

This is true where the offsetting tax became payable to Washington by reason of purchase or use within the state. It

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1997 (TRI)

C.C.E. Vs. Citizen Washing Machines Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1997)(93)ELT95Tri(Chennai)

and 84.21. It is agreed that heading 84.50 covers only washing machines with or without dryers and not the spin dryers

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1911 (FN)

Spokane Andc.; Ry. Co. Vs. Wash. and Gt. nor. Ry. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

an action in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Ferry County, to enjoin the Washington & Great Northern

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 24 1983 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Wash Udyog

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)LC1127DTri(Delhi)

1. Facts of the case in brief are that the respondent imported two consignments of "class E other high temperature...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //