Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 49 of about 750 results (0.021 seconds)Harendra Mohan Vyas vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Rohit Singh @ Rinku vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 180/2019 ROHIT SINGH @ RINKU ........ Petitioner versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. Anushree Kapadia, Adv. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.61/2018 under Sections 379/394/397/411/506/120-B of the IPC, Police Station Jama Masjid.2. The subject FIR has been registered on the complaint of an employee of Sanjay Sales Agency.3. As per the complainant, he was instructed by the owner to transport goods and money in a van from their shop at Fateh Puri, Delhi to the factory at Patparganj, Delhi. It is alleged that the complainant had put four boxes in the back of the van containing goods and Rs. 15 lakhs in cash. As per the complainant after putting BAIL APPLN. 18...
Tag this Judgment!P S Rajput vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Reserved on:18. 12.2018 Judgment Pronounced on:12. 02.2019 WP(C) 4929/2017 & CM No.21314/2017 P S RAJPUT ....... Petitioner Through: Mr. P. Sureshan, Advocate Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Amit Mahajan, CGSC with Mr. Randeep Sachdeva, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present petition has been filed seeking to set aside the office orders dated 02.03.2015 and letter dated 03.09.2015 whereby the respondents have denied the grant of 3rd MACP to the petitioner with effect from 02.01.2015 with a further direction to the respondents to grant him 3rd MACP with effect from 02.01.2015 with interest @18% per annum as well as arrears of pay and other consequential benefits.2. The facts relevant to the present case are that the petitioner was appointed as a Constable (GD) with the CISF vide order dated 11/15.01.1985 w.e.f. 02.01.1985 in ...
Tag this Judgment!Suman Jain vs.mohd. Akhtar. & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:12. 02.2019 + W.P.(C) 1171/2017 & CM No.5324/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus CHELMSFORD CLUB LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 1212/2017 & CM No.5502/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus CHELMSFORD CLUB LTD. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS WITH + W.P.(C) 3938/2017 & CM No.17354/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus MOHD. AKHTAR. & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS AND + W.P.(C) 4946/2017 & CM No.21381/2017 SUMAN JAIN ........ Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: W.P.(C) 1171/2017 and other connected matters Page 1 of 27 For the... Petitioner: Mr S. D. Singh, Mr Puneet Kumar Jain, Mr Rahul Kumar Singh and Ms Kamla Kumar and Mr Kartik Arora. For the... RESPONDENTS: Mr Kishan Rawat and MrRajanNarain, Prabhakar, Advocate Advocates for R-1. Mr Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R-3/UOI. Mr Jawahar Raja, ASC, GNCTD with Ms Kritika Padode, Advocate for R-5 a...
Tag this Judgment!o.p.gupta vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Hc/Ro Ravikant Chaudhary & Ors. Vs.union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6680/2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. TANAKA RAM AND ORS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate for R/UOI. + W.P.(C) 10189/2016 HC/RO RAVIKANT CHAUDHARY & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj and Mr. Shashwat Sharma, Advocates for R-UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. 151 Constables of the Border Security Force (BSF) [(53 in W.P. (C) 6680 of 2017 and 98 in W.P. (C) 10189 of 2017]. have come together to file the present petitions seeking a writ of mandamus to the... RESPONDENTS to extend WP(C) 6680/2017 & 10189/2016 Page 1 of 11 to them the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme in accordance with the CCS (Pension) R...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Mishra vs.usha Rani Verma & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:06. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:12. h February, 2019 + RC.REV. 205/2018 & CM APPL No.19249/2018 RAMESH MISHRA ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Satish Sahai, Mr.Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr.Shivansh Soni and Ms.Deepika Mishra, Advocates. versus USHA RANI VERMA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Kamal Mehta and Mr.Deepak Sahni, Advocates for respondents with respondents No.1 & 2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision challenges the impugned order dated 15.01.2018 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller/Pilot Court (Central District), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter Trial Court) in Eviction Petition E-908/2017 CIS No.1050/2017 titled "Smt Usha Rani Verma & Another Vs Shri Mahesh Mishra and Another filed by the landlord/respondents herein against the tenant/petitioner under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act).2. The learned Trial Court vide i...
Tag this Judgment!Shirley Silvana Lasut vs.directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A.813/2014 SHIRLEY SILVANA LASUT Date of Order: February 12, 2019 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Kushal Gupta, Advocate Versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Satish Aggarwala, Senior CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Standing Counsel ORDER (ORAL) Impugned judgment of 28th November, 2013 holds appellant guilty for the offence punishable under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Act, 1985 and vide order of 13th December, 2013 appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for ten years with fine of 1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, appellant has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. The facts as noticed in the impugned judgment are as under:-"The brief facts of the case are that on 26.11.2009 at about 2:00 PM PW/IO Sh Angad Meena had gathered some secret intelligence from a reliable source that one Indonesian national by the name ...
Tag this Judgment!Manu Bala Sharma vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Subhash Chand vs.high Court of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 11551/2018 & CM APPL.44694/2018 SUBHASH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Satyakam & Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocates versus HIGH COURT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr.K.Parameshwar, Advocate CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J.(ORAL) % 1. The petitioner is an officer of this Court serving in the post of Administrative Officer (Judicial). He participated in a departmental examination for the post of Senior Judicial Assistant in the year 2017 but was unsuccessful. His representation for re-evaluation of his answer sheet has been rejected by the establishment of the High Court vide communications dated 13.04.2018 and 30.05.2018, which are challenged in this writ petition.2. It is pointed out at the outset by Mr. K. Parameshwar, learned counsel for the respondent that this Court has declined similar relief to another candidate in respect of...
Tag this Judgment!