Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 20 of about 723 results (0.011 seconds)Smt. Veena Devi Vs. Sh. Yogesh Kumar
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA No.19/2014 24th January, 2014 % SMT. VEENA DEVI Through: ......Appellant Mr. Nitin Ahlawat, Advocate. VERSUS SH. YOGESH KUMAR ...... Respondent Through: CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) C.M. No.1352/2014 (exemption) Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions. C.M. stands disposed of. C.M. No.1353/2014 (condonation of delay) For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned. C.M. stands disposed of. + RSA No.19/2014 1. By this Regular Second Appeal challenge is laid to two concurrent judgments of the Courts below by which the suit of the appellant/plaintiff by which redemption was prayed of the mortgaged suit property being house on plot No.2, Block A-2, JJ Colony, Slum Sector-1, Pappan Kalan, Dwarka, New Delhi. The case as set up on behalf of the appellant/plaintiff was that though the documents in question dated 1.7.200...
Tag this Judgment!The United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Deepak Goel and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-10A * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:24. h January, 2014 % + MAC.APP.No.750/2006 THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.K.L.Nandwani, Advocate. Versus DEEPAK GOEL & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Nitinjaya Chaudhary and Ms. Sushma, Advocates for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Present appeal is preferred against the impugned award dated 11.07.2006, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.9,26,415/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum in favour of the respondents/claimants from the date of filing of the claim petition, i.e., 19.02.1996 till realization of the amount.2. The present appeal is filed by the appellant/Insurance Company only on the ground that the negligence has not been proved by the claimant, despite, the learned Tribunal has awarded compensation.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance C...
Tag this Judgment!Shree Adya Katyayani Shaktipeeth(Mandir) Trust and O Vs. Dr. R.C.Jain
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 07.2013 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2014 CS(OS) 1798/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10428-29/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH (MANDIR) TRUST & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates along with Mr. J.N.Pruthi, Trustee for the plaintiff. versus SHRI P.P. SHRIVASTAV Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1799/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10431-32/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH (MANDIR) TRUST & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates along with Mr. J.N. Pruthi, Trustee for the plaintiff. versus SHRI SHASHI BHUSHAN SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1800/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10434-35/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mr...
Tag this Judgment!Shree Adya Katyayani Shaktipeeth(Mandir) Trust and O Vs. Shri Shashi B ...
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:24. 07.2013 Judgment delivered on:24. 01.2014 CS(OS) 1798/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10428-29/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH (MANDIR) TRUST & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates along with Mr. J.N.Pruthi, Trustee for the plaintiff. versus SHRI P.P. SHRIVASTAV Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1799/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10431-32/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH (MANDIR) TRUST & ORS ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocates along with Mr. J.N. Pruthi, Trustee for the plaintiff. versus SHRI SHASHI BHUSHAN SHARMA ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Gaurav Mahajan, Advocate. AND + CS(OS) 1800/2008 and I.A. Nos. 10434-35/2008 SHREE ADYA KATYAYANI SHAKTIPEETH & ORS. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Meenakshi Lekhi and Mr.Mr...
Tag this Judgment!Raj Rani and anr Vs. Sumitra Parashar and anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on :07.10.2013 Judgment Pronounced on:24. 01.2014 + IA No.8419/2013 in CS(OS) 2154/2010 RAJ RANI & ANR Through ..... Plaintiff Mr.Ravi Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.Lalit Gupta, Mr.Kamal Mehta and Ms.Payal Gupta, Advocates versus SUMITRA PARASHAR & ANR ... Defendant Through Mr.Harish Malhotra, Senior Advocate with Mr.B.C.Pandey and Mr.Rajinder Aggarwal, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.8419/2013 (Order VI Rule 17 CPC) 1. The present application is filed for amendment of the plaint. The plaintiff has filed the present Suit seeking the relief of possession, recovery of damages/mesne profits, permanent and mandatory injunction pertaining to property No.53, Sector-12, Block-B, Dwarka, New Delhi. It is averred in the plaint that the parties to the Suit are close relatives i.e. plaintiff No.2 and defendant No.2 being real brothers while plaintiff No.1 is wife of plaintiff No.2 and defendant N...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Bses Rajdhani Power Limited Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and ors ...
Court: Delhi
#34, 37, 42 $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI34 + W.P.(C) 529/2014 M/S BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warrier, Mr. Aashish Gupta, Mr. Dushyant Manocha and Mr. Aditya Mukherjee, Mr. Aditya Shankar and Mr. Nikhil Rohatgi, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Prashant Bhushan with Ms. Pyoli and Mr. Govind Jee, Advocates for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Ms. Biji Rajesh and Ms. Snigdha Sharma, Advocates for CAG. AND37 + W.P.(C) 539/2014 M/S BSES YAMUNA POWER LIMTIED ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warier, Mr. Aashish Gupta, Mr. Dushyat Manocha and Mr. Aditya Mukherjee, Advocates versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr. Prashant Bhushan with Ms. Pyoli and Mr. Govind Jee, Advocates for Govt. of NCT of Delhi. Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Mr. ...
Tag this Judgment!Resham Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL3241998 Reserved on:9. h January, 2014 Date of Decision:24. h January, 2014 % RESHAM SINGH .... Appellant Through Mr. Dinesh Mathur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocate. versus STATE . Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP with SI Sammarpal Singh, P.S Kalkaji. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G. P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Appellant Resham Singh by the impugned judgment dated 18 th July, 1998 stands convicted under Sections 302 read with Section 34 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). By impugned order of sentence dated 20th July, 1998, he has been convicted for imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.15,000/-, in default he has to undergo simple imprisonment for four months for the offence under Section 302/34 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for five years and a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default, he has to undergo simple imprisonment Crl. A. 324/1998 for three Section 394 IP...
Tag this Judgment!Mr. Deepak Khosla Vs. Honble High Court of Delhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:11. 11.2013 Pronounced on:24. 01.2014 + WP(C) No.2401/2013 & CM Nos.14605-14607/2013 MR. DEEPAK KHOSLA .Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Khosla, Petitioner in person. Versus HONBLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI & ORS. Respondents Through : Mr. A.Sharma, proxy counsel for Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Advocate for Respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. In this writ proceeding, the petitioner Mr. Deepak Khosla claims several directions. These concern six general issues, i.e., the need to frame rules under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rules as to when orders should be pronounced after the judgment is reserved and procedure to be adopted when applications are filed in such reserved cases, norms to enforce judicial discipline and avoid conflicting orders and practice directions with respect to listing of petitions under Section 9 and 11 of the Arbitration and Con...
Tag this Judgment!Dhan Singh Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on January 15, 2014 Judgment Delivered on January 24, 2014 + W.P.(C) 5920/2010 DHAN SINGH Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Rajiv Aggarwal Advocate with Mr.Anuj Aggarwal, Advocate versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Respondent Represented by: Ms.Saroj Bidawat, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.KAMESWAR RAO V.KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. The writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Dhan Singh challenging the validity of the Award dated August 06, 2008 passed by the Industrial Tribunal in I.D No.09/2007, whereby the Tribunal has rejected the claim of the petitioner and denied him the relief.2. The case pleaded by the petitioner in his statement of claim was that he worked with the respondent since July 1999 as a Beldar. He was treated as a daily rated/casual muster roll worker and was paid minimum wages as fixed and revised from time to time under the Minimum Wages Act. He also pleaded that his counterparts doing ident...
Tag this Judgment!Rakesh Kumar and anr Vs. Rakesh Kumar and anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :25.10.2013 Decided on :24. 01.2014 IA No.1275/2013 in CS(OS) 1727/2012 ... Plaintiffs RAKESH KUMAR & ANR Through Mr. T.K. Ganju, Senior Advocate with Mr. Bharat Gupta, Advocate versus SAROJ MARWAH & ANR Through ... Defendants Mr. Mr. S. Suri with Ms. Gunjan Kumar and Mr. Ankit Khurana, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.IA No.1275/2013(u/O7 11 CPC) 1. The present suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a decree of declaration and mandatory injunction. The plaintiff is stated to have purchased the suit property from defendant No.1 vide sale deed dated 19.05.2009. The property in question is half undivided share in property bearing No.51/4-B, Desh Bandhu Gupta Road, Karol Bagh, Delhi-110005 admeasuring 576.53. square yards. It is urged that symbolic possession was handed over to the plaintiff at the time of sale inasmuch as defendant No.2 Bank was a tenant in the suit property running its currency chest ...
Tag this Judgment!