Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 17 of about 723 results (0.046 seconds)Rijaul Karim Vs. State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 01.2014 Date of Decision:27. 01.2014 % + CRL.A. 32/2013 RIJAUL KARIM ..... Appellant Through: Dr. (Mr.) M.K. Gahlaut & Ms. Anita Verma, Advs. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1134/2013 RAFIQUL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 05th July, 2010, Cipher R. Gopal, who at that time was working in BSF as Head Constable, was brought to Safdarjung Hospital by a friend, with alleged history of poisoning, while travelling from Nizamuddin Railway Station in an auto rickshaw. He was drowsy at that time though there was no sign of any external injury on his body. An information in this regard was given to Police Station Sangam Vihar on the same date and was recorded vide DD No.25B which was given to SI Bharat Singh for investigatio...
Tag this Judgment!Saregama India Ltd. Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 149/2007 % Date of decision: January 27, 2014 SAREGAMA INDIA LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ankur Sangal, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yogesh Verma, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL VEENA BIRBAL, J.1. The petitioner filed the present petition u/s 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of order dated 31st August, 2006 wherein learned M.M. has taken the cognizance and summoned the petitioner as well as for quashing of criminal complaint being case no.513/2006 pending before the Ld. M.M.2. Briefly the case of the petitioner is as under:- 3. The petitioner is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at Kolkatta. It is stated that petitioner is a part of the RPG Group of Companies and is a leading manufacturer of music compact discs and audio video discs having leading name in the market through ...
Tag this Judgment!Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Rukhsana @ Khushbu ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. h January, 2014 + MAC.APP. 511/2006 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Garima Prasad and Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates. Versus RUKHSANA @ KHUSHBU & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 521/2006 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Garima Prasad and Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates. Versus SMT. NANHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. These appeals have arisen from the common judgment dated 16.03.2006, whereby the learned Tribunal decided Suit Nos.11/04 and 10/04 respectively.2. Vide aforesaid impugned award dated 16.03.2006, the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.3,95,800/- for the death of Kallu in Suit No.10/04 and Rs.2,93,000/- for the death of Smt.Chhutto in Suit No.11/04. Interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum was al...
Tag this Judgment!Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Govt. of Nct Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 29/2010 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Reena V. George, Adv. Mr. Indu Prakash Singh for NGO/ Shahri Adhikari Manch-Begharaon Ke Saath. Ms. Usha Nischal for NGO/Mahilayen Pragati Ki Or. versus GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ANR. Through: W.P.(C) 29 of 2010 ..... Respondents Mr. Parvinder Chauhan, Adv. DUSIB Ms. Meera Bhatia, Adv. for UOI. Proxy Counsel for Ms. Zubeda Begum, Adv. for GNCTD. Mr. Sunil Satyarthi, Adv. for Delhi Cantonment Board. Mr. Ajay Verma, Adv. for DDA. Mr. Ajay Arora, Adv. for MCD. Mr. A.K. Singh, Adv. for intervener/Joint Apex Advisory Committee. Ms.Geetanjali Mohan, Adv. for Railways. Mr. Manish Srivastava along with Mr.Rahul Malhotra, Advs. for BYPL/NDPL/BRPL. Ms. Sangeeta Sondhi, Adv. for Police Dept. Dr. Rajneesh Kumar Garg, Add. DCP/North SI Dinesh Beniwal, PS Lodhi Clony. SI Surendra Sharma, Connaught Place. SI Ashok Kumar, Kashmere Gate. Page 1 of 3 SI Prem Kumar, Civil Lines. Insp. Bijender...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Sukhdev Dhal and ors. Vs. United India Ins. Co. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h January, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.428/2013 SH. SUKHDEV DHAL & ORS. Represented by: .....Appellants Mr. S.N. Parashar, Advocate. Versus UNITED INDIA INS. CO. LTD. Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr. P.R.Sikka and Mr.Amet Sikka, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal has been preferred against the impugned award dated 20.01.2010, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.2,82,000/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. Vide the present appeal, appellants are seeking enhancement of the compensation amount noted above.3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has argued that on the date of accident, the deceased was 25 years of age. He was a bachelor and left behind his parents. He submitted that while calculating the loss of dependency, the learned Tribunal taki...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Israni Telecom Pvt Ltd Vs. Sh Akhil Rohtagi and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h January, 2014 % + RFA3512013 M/S ISRANI TELECOM PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Praveen Mahajan, Adv. Versus SH AKHIL ROHTAGI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shyam Dutt & Mr. Akhil Rohatgi, Advs. for R-1. AND + RFA4062013 M/S ISRANI TELECOM PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Praveen Mahajan, Adv. Versus SH AKHIL ROHATGI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shyam Dutt & Mr. Akhil Rohatgi, Advs. for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The two appeals impugn the common judgment dated 7 th February, 2013 of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Central-8, Delhi of dismissal of CS No.01/10 (ID No.02401C1062582005) filed by the appellant / plaintiff and allowing the counter claim No.2/05/10 (ID No.02401C1051662005) filed by the respondents / defendants. The appeals were admitted for hearing and notice thereof accept...
Tag this Judgment!Raju @ Rajinder and anr Vs. State of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of Judgment:27.01.2014. CRL.APPEAL No.74-75/2006 RAJU @ RAJINDER AND ANR. Through ..... Appellants Mr. K.B. Andley, Sr. Adv. with Mr.M. Shamikh, Adv. versus STATE OF DELHI Through ..... Respondent Ms. Fizani Husain, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.(Oral) 1 The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 19.01.2006 and 24.01.2006 respectively wherein the appellants Rajinder and Surender (brothers) had been convicted under Section 304 of the IPC and had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 4 years as also to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- each; in default of payment of fine, to undergo RI for a period of 1 year. Out of the total fine of Rs.50,000/-, Rs.40,000/- was to be paid as compensation to the heirs of the deceased. Fine amount has since been paid. 2 The version of the prosecution was unfolded in the version of Ram Kumar (PW-7). He was an eye-witness and the brothe...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Variety Book Depot Vs. Snab Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on:17. 01.2014 Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2014 O.M.P. 66/2014 M/S VARIETY BOOK DEPOT ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. P.V. Kapur, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Abhijat, Mr. V.K. Nagrath, Mr. Aaditya Vijay Kumar, Mr. Abhay Verma, Mr. Siddhant Kapur & Mr. Harsh, Advocates. versus SNAB PUBLISHERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Anand, Ms. Kajal Chandra, Ms. Prachi Gupta, Ms.Renu Kumar, Mr. Anish Khanna, Ms. Swati Sinha & Mr. Shubham Tripathi, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.Caveat No.51/2014 1. The caveator has appeared. The caveat stands discharged. I.A. No.919/2014 2. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exemptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P. No.66/2014 3. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondent caveator accepts notice.4. I have heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner as also the learned counsel for the respondent and proceed to disp...
Tag this Judgment!Smt Preeti Arora Vs. Sh Aniket Subhash Kore
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:27. 01.2014 + CM(M) 1358 OF2013SMT PREETI ARORA Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Somdutt Kaushik, Adv. versus SH ANIKET SUBHASH KORE ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI1 This is a petition challenging the order of the Additional District Judge disallowing the petitioners application to bring on record print outs of certain e-mails allegedly exchanged between the parties. The Honble Supreme Court had transferred the case to the Karkardooma Courts at Delhi with a direction that the petition be disposed off as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 9 months from the date of framing of issues. CM(M) 1358/2013 disallowing the petitioners application was that after pleadings of the parties had been completed and issues were framed on 25.05.2013 and evidence of the petitioner have been completed on 20.09.2013 the documents were sought to be brought on recor...
Tag this Judgment!Yameen @ Bobby Vs. Suresh Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: January 27, 2014 + RC. Rev. No.425/2012 & C.M. No.21586/2012 YAMEEN @ BOBBY Through ..... Petitioner Mr.Lal Bahadur Pandey, Adv. versus SURESH KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Through Mr.R.D.Sharma, Adv. with Mr.Rajat Sharma & Mr.Chetan Sharma, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. By this order I propose to decide the revision petition filed by the tenant/petitioner under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as Act) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India.2. The facts of the matter are that the respondent filed an eviction petition for eviction of the petitioner on the grounds of bonafide requirement. It was stated that the respondent is the owner and landlord of the property bearing No.1/4935, Balbir Nagar Extn., 60 Feet Road, Shahdara, Delhi-110032. The petitioner is a tenant in one shop on the ground floor, as shown in red colour in the site pl...
Tag this Judgment!