Delhi Court January 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 16 of about 723 results (0.022 seconds)Rafiqul Vs. State (Gnct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:24. 01.2014 Date of Decision:27. 01.2014 % + CRL.A. 32/2013 RIJAUL KARIM ..... Appellant Through: Dr. (Mr.) M.K. Gahlaut & Ms. Anita Verma, Advs. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through: + ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CRL.A. 1134/2013 RAFIQUL Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. versus STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 05th July, 2010, Cipher R. Gopal, who at that time was working in BSF as Head Constable, was brought to Safdarjung Hospital by a friend, with alleged history of poisoning, while travelling from Nizamuddin Railway Station in an auto rickshaw. He was drowsy at that time though there was no sign of any external injury on his body. An information in this regard was given to Police Station Sangam Vihar on the same date and was recorded vide DD No.25B which was given to SI Bharat Singh for investigatio...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Paras Singhal and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h January, 2014 % + MAC.APP. 807/2005 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Sourabh Kumar Tuteja, Adv. Versus PARAS SINGHAL AND ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Navneet Goyal, Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the impugned Award dated 30.07.2005 whereby Learned Tribunal granted compensation of Rs. 13,69,568/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of framing of the issues, i.e., 21.04.2004 till realisation.2. It is pertinent to mention that initially, the claim petition was filed under section 163-A of the Motor Vehicles Act and subsequently, it was amended and converted into a petition under section 166 of the M.V. Act.3. Mr. Sourabh Kumar Tuteja, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant argued that car bearing No.HR-26-2990 had caused the accident, however, the Ld. Tribuna...
Tag this Judgment!ikea Trading (India) Vs. the Value Added Tax Officer and anr.
Court: Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:27. 01.2014 + W.P.(C) 4220/2012, C.M. APPL. 2026/2013 IKEA TRADING (INDIA) ..... Petitioner Through : Appearance not given. versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Ms. Latika Chaudhry, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. The petitioners grievance before this Court is that a sum of `2,55,11,598/- has to be paid to it by the respondents (hereafter referred to as the VAT Department).2. The brief facts are that the petitioner, a registered dealer, was, at the relevant time, exporting home furnishing products, including carpets, durries, fabrics, plastic articles, lamps, soft toys etc. The petitioner had, during the course of VAT proceedings filed objections to the Assessing Officers (AOs) determinations. These objections were not decided in eight months time as required by the relevant statutory provision. ...
Tag this Judgment!Rajinder Kumar Goel Vs. North Delhi Municipal Corporation and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 590/2014 RAJINDER KUMAR GOEL Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Gaurav Duggal, Mr. Shyam S. Sharma & Mr. Sanjeev K.Baliyan, Advocates versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Puja Kalra, Adv. for R-1/NDMC with Mr. Rajesh Yadav, JE(B), Karol Bagh Zone CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA % SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA, J.(ORAL) CM APPL. No.1186/2014 Exemption, as prayed for, is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed off. W.P.(C) 590/2014 The writ petitioner is aggrieved of the alleged unauthorised construction comprising of as much as six floors at property 6154/1, Street No.5, Dev Nagar, Karol Bagh, New Delhi. It is alleged that the said construction is entirely without authorisation and is illegal. It is further alleged that repeated complaints in this regard made to the authorities over a period of time have been ignored. Photographs showing the nature and ...
Tag this Judgment!iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Renu Arora and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:27. h January, 2014 % + MAC.APP. No.439/2013 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Represented by: .....Appellant Mr. Abhishek, Advocate. Versus RENU ARORA & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr. Vikas Agarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.(Oral) 1. Instant appeal is directed against the impugned award dated 01.04.2013, whereby the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.15,21,891/- with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the petition till realization of the amount.2. The sole ground argued by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant/Insurance Company is that on the date of accident, the deceased was 21 years of age and not in a permanent job, despite that the learned Tribunal has wrongly added 50% of the income of the deceased towards future prospect in contrary to the dictum of the Apex Court in the case of Sarla Verma Vs. DTC a...
Tag this Judgment!Sh S S Brar Vs. Smt Gulner Ziaf
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:27. 01.2014 FAO(OS) 62/2014 SH S S BRAR .... Appellant versus SMT GULNER ZIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent : Mr Sunil Satyarthi and Mr Raman Gandhi : None CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) CM No.1564/2014 The exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. FAO(OS) 62/2014 & CM No.1563/2014 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.12.2013 passed by a learned Single Judge of this court in I.A No.19373/2013 in CS(OS) No.1888/2009. The said application was filed purportedly under Order IX Rule 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. By virtue of the said application, the appellant / plaintiff sought recall of the order dated 29.10.2013 whereby the suit filed by the appellant was dismissed by noticing that despite repeated opportunities, the appellant / plaintiff had...
Tag this Judgment!Shiksha Vs. State
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :21.01.2014. Judgment delivered on:- 27.01.2014. CRL.A. 34/2006 SHIKSHA Through: versus STATE Through: + ..... Appellant Mr.Rajesh Khanna, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP along with SI Daya Kishan. CRL.A. 128/2006 SANJEEV TYAGI @ CHIDDI BOSE ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rajesh Khanna, Advocate. versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP along with SI Daya Kishan. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The appellants before this Court are a mother and son. Shiksha is the mother and Sanjeev is her son. They are aggrieved by the impugned judgment dated 19.12.2005 wherein they had been convicted under Sections 307/325 read with Section 34 of the IPC. Accused Sanjeev Tyagi had been convicted separately under Section 25 of the Arms Act. Vide order of sentence dated 24.12.2005, each of them had been sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs....
Tag this Judgment!Rahul@parcha Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on:22. 01.2014 Date of Decision:27. 01.2014 + CRL. APPEAL5892013 RAHUL@PARCHA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Singh, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Feroz Khan Ghazi, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN JUDGMENT V.K.JAIN, J.On 22nd September, 2011 at about 7.05 am, ASI S. Dayal of Police Post Tis Hazari informed Police Station Kashmiri Gate that Constable Hukum Prakash of BSF, who was coming on a rickshaw to Mori Gate had been stabbed in front of Sarvodaya Vidyalaya and 3-4 persons had run away with his belongings. The information was recorded at the police station vide DD No.8A, which was handed over to SI Anuj Kumar for investigation. On reaching the spot, the Investigating Officer came to know that the injured had been taken to Aruna Asaf Ali Hospital. He reached the aforesaid hospital and recorded the statement of the injured. The complainant told him that...
Tag this Judgment!Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Nanhi and ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:27. h January, 2014 + MAC.APP. 511/2006 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Garima Prasad and Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates. Versus RUKHSANA @ KHUSHBU & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. AND + MAC.APP. 521/2006 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Garima Prasad and Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates. Versus SMT. NANHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Represented by: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT SURESH KAIT, J.1. These appeals have arisen from the common judgment dated 16.03.2006, whereby the learned Tribunal decided Suit Nos.11/04 and 10/04 respectively.2. Vide aforesaid impugned award dated 16.03.2006, the learned Tribunal has granted compensation for a sum of Rs.3,95,800/- for the death of Kallu in Suit No.10/04 and Rs.2,93,000/- for the death of Smt.Chhutto in Suit No.11/04. Interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum was al...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Israni Telecom Pvt Ltd Vs. Sh Akhil Rohatgi and ors
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:27. h January, 2014 % + RFA3512013 M/S ISRANI TELECOM PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Praveen Mahajan, Adv. Versus SH AKHIL ROHTAGI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shyam Dutt & Mr. Akhil Rohatgi, Advs. for R-1. AND + RFA4062013 M/S ISRANI TELECOM PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Chetan Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Praveen Mahajan, Adv. Versus SH AKHIL ROHATGI & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Shyam Dutt & Mr. Akhil Rohatgi, Advs. for R-1. CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. The two appeals impugn the common judgment dated 7 th February, 2013 of the Additional District Judge (ADJ), Central-8, Delhi of dismissal of CS No.01/10 (ID No.02401C1062582005) filed by the appellant / plaintiff and allowing the counter claim No.2/05/10 (ID No.02401C1051662005) filed by the respondents / defendants. The appeals were admitted for hearing and notice thereof accept...
Tag this Judgment!