Delhi Court July 1995 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 1995 Page 16 of about 155 results (0.021 seconds)D.N. Sharma Vs. S.P. Suri
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 1995IIIAD(Delhi)353; 1995(35)DRJ285
Usha Mehra, J. (1) ADMIT. (2) The respondent Shri S.P.Suri was a permanent Assistant of C.S.S. cadre of the Ministry of Home Affairs, officiating as Section Officer on ad hoc basis in the said Ministry. He retired from the service w.e.f. the afternoon of 30th June,1994. As an official of the Ministry of Home Affairs, he was allotted a Government accommodation. Presently he and his family are occupying the said Government accommodation. After his retirement he was required under the rules to vacate the Government accommodation. Accordingly, he approached the present petitioner to vacate the premises under his tenancy, so that the same could be occupied by him and to enable him to leave the Government accommodation. It had also been the case of the landlord/ Mr.S.P.Suri that the present petitioner assured that he would vacate the premises. The petitioner had been allotted by the D.D.A. under the S.F.S.Scheme a house bearing No.B-1/1109 situated at Vasant Kunj, New Delhi. The flat is a du...
Tag this Judgment!Tulsi Devi Khungar and ors. Vs. Khairati Lal Jetley
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 1995(34)DRJ386
Mohd. Shamim, J. (1) This revision petition is directed against an order dated May 2,1995 passed by an Additional Rent Controller, Delhi where by the learned lower court dismissed the application for leave to defend and passed an order of eviction in respect of the premises shown by red colour in the site plan EX.CA ( Annexure A). (2) Brief facts which gave rise to the present petition are as under: that one Shri Khairati Lal Jetley, Lt. Col. (Retd.), (hereinafter referred to as the respondent for the sake of convenience) let out premises bearing No. D-15, defense Colony, New Delhi, to one Shri Narain Dass Khungar for residential purposes. Shri Narain Dass Khunger breathed his last on August 26,1981 leaving behind the present petitioners as his legal heirs. (3) The respondent herein initially filed a petition for eviction against the petitioners under Section 14(l)(e) read with Section 25B of the Delhi Rent Control Act ( 'the Act' for short), in the year 1983. The said petition was dis...
Tag this Judgment!R.N. Gupta and ors. Vs. State and ors.
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 1995IIIAD(Delhi)566; 59(1995)DLT432; 1995(34)DRJ469; 1995RLR474
S.K. Mahajan, J. (1) This order will dispose of the application filed by Mrs.Pramila Gupta under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act for revocation of the grant of probate of the Will dated 21st February, 1985 executed by the deceased on the ground that the probate had been obtained by playing fraud on the Court. (2) The facts in short are that Smt.Shanti Devi, widow of late Ram Kishan Das died on 19th March, 1986. Petition for probate was made by Shri R.N. Gupta and Smt.Savitri Devi Gupta, son-in-law and daughter of the deceased. In the application for the grant of the probate of the Will dated 21st February, 1985 executed by the deceased Smt.Shanti Devi, Along with the Will the list of near relatives of the deceased was also annexed. The names of the near relatives in the said list were Smt.Savitri Devi Gupta - petitioner No.2, Shri Sooraj Narain Gupta - husband of the predeceased daughter of the deceased. Proclamation of the petition was made in the newspaper and notice was also is...
Tag this Judgment!Uppal Engineering Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Central Warehousing Corpo ...
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 60(1995)DLT436
Devinder Gupta, J.(1) Mahabir Prasad, Chief Engineer (Retd.), U.P.P.W.D. made and published his award on 27.1.1987, who was appointed as an Arbitrator under Clause 25 of the agreement dated 8.1.1979 by the Managing Director. Central Warehousing Corporation Limited, New Delhi through its letter dated 30.12.1981 with respect to the disputes relating to contract between the parties dated 8.1.1979 for the work of construction 10500 M.T. capacity godown with ancillaries at Central Warehouse, It awa. (2) To the award, on being filed in Court, objections were filed by the claimant alone, which are resisted by the respondent. On 13th July, 1988 an issue was framed whether the award is liable to be modified/set aside on the objections of the petitioner. (3) The objections are many but at the time of hearing arguments, learned Counsel for the claimant confined his submissions only to the objection as regards counter Claim No. 10 of the respondent. It was stated at the bar that claimant's objecti...
Tag this Judgment!Maher Mohd. Rafiq Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Reported in: 1995IIIAD(Delhi)308; 1995CriLJ3590; 1995(3)Crimes477; 59(1995)DLT587; 1995(34)DRJ221
Dalveer Bhandari, J. (1) This appeal arises out of the judgment dated 5th May, 1994 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions judge in Sessions case No. 24/94. By this judgment the appellant has been convicted under Section 21 of the Ndps Act and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000.00 and in default of payment of fine, the appellant has been further directed to undergo the rigrous imprisonment of one-year.(2) The case of the prosecution against the appellant is that on 29th September, 1993 the Sub- Inspector Dalip Singh of the Anti Auto Theft Squad received a secret information that a foreigner carrying heroine would come at G.T. Road in one white gypsy vehicle carrying heroine. The information was reduced into writing and was given to the A.C.P.(Head Quarter) and in the meantime raiding party was organized by joining police officials and thereafter the raiding party reached at the spot. One public person was joined in the...
Tag this Judgment!