Saini Pushpinder Vs. Jagir Singh” by Making Statement in the Court Which Was - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Mar-24-2014

Court: Punjab and Haryana

LAW: Section 13-B, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 120-B of Indian Penal Code, section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act for Dissolution

CARDINAL: 2013(O&M, 24.3.2014, CORAM:-, 25.12.2003, No.1, Rs.5, No.2, 3, 406, 467, 468, 471, 1, 4.6.2010, No.2 to 4, 16, 33, 17, 5, 18

PERSON: Singh Bassi, Appellant(s, Versus Kuljit Kaur, A.S.Gill, Kumar Garg, Sikh, Gurbax Kaur, Tilak Raj Tandon, Nakodar, Tilak Raj, Shri Tilak Raj Tandon, Gurbax Kaur @ Baksho, Kuljit Kaur, Saini Pushpinder, Kapurthala, Kulwinder Kaur, Jagir Singh, Jasbir Singh, OPP4, Chandigarh Defendant, Customary Divorce, Chandigarh Hence, Saini, GARG, Chandigarh Saini

ORG: Respondent(s, United Kingdon, Baksho, Court, Saini, Nakodar, DSP, Sections 420, Haryana High Court, Oath, OPP3, Plaintiff, the Lower Appellate Court, the State of Punjab, Smt, GPA

ORDINAL: second

DATE: 1.3.2002, a few days, Rs.50,000/-, 25.12.2003, March 24, 2014 (, 2013

FAC: Sultanpur Lodhi

GPE: District Kapurthala, England, Kalaran, Ex, Jagir

PRODUCT: No.1, 1 & 2 Code of Civil Procedure, P-3

TIME: 2014.03.27 16:26

NORP: Hindu, Saini, Punjab

WORK_OF_ART: Customary Divorce Deed