Tilghman Vs. Culver - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/99926
SubjectMiscellaneous
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnMar-28-1960
Case Number362 U.S. 308
AppellantTilghman
RespondentCulver
Excerpt:
tilghman v. culver - 362 u.s. 308 (1960) u.s. supreme court tilghman v. culver, 362 u.s. 308 (1960) 362 u.s. 308 tilghman v. culver, prison custodian. on motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus. no. 135, misc. decided march 28, 1960. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: ___ so.2d ___. petitioner pro se. richard w. ervin, attorney general of florida, and reeves bowen, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. the motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. in view of the representations of the attorney general of florida that the cause has become moot, the judgment of the supreme court of florida is vacated and the cause is remanded for such further proceedings as that court may deem appropriate. see n. a. a. c. p. v. committee on offenses against the administration of justice, 358 u.s. 40 . page 362 u.s. 308, 309
Judgment:
TILGHMAN v. CULVER - 362 U.S. 308 (1960)
U.S. Supreme Court TILGHMAN v. CULVER, 362 U.S. 308 (1960) 362 U.S. 308

TILGHMAN v. CULVER, PRISON CUSTODIAN.
ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS.
No. 135, Misc.
Decided March 28, 1960.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: ___ So.2d ___.

Petitioner pro se.

Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Reeves Bowen, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion for leave to file a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Treating the papers submitted as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is granted. In view of the representations of the Attorney General of Florida that the cause has become moot, the judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is vacated and the cause is remanded for such further proceedings as that Court may deem appropriate. See N. A. A. C. P. v. Committee on Offenses Against the Administration of Justice, 358 U.S. 40 .

Page 362 U.S. 308, 309