Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment

Judgment:

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 0
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
U.S. Supreme Court Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 1
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Argued March 28-29, 1955

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 2
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Decided April 11, 1955 *

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 3
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

349 U.S. 44

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 4
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 5
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 6
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Syllabus

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 7
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 8
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 9
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

PER CURIAM.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 10
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672 , that

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 11
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Page 349 U. S. 45

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 12
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The Phillips case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co., 340 U. S. 179 , and Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma, 340 U. S. 190 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 13
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Reversed.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 14
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin, 347 U. S. 672 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 15
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

* Together with No. 321, Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al., also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '98987',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
			'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="45">
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98432/cities-service-co-vs-peerless">
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98433/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-oklahoma">
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/98889/phillips-petroleum-co-vs-wisconsin">
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '98987',
		(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co Vs Panoma Corp - Citation 98987 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '98987',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '349 U.S. 44',
		'appellant' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co.',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp.',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1955-04-11',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 </p>
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 </p>
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 </p>
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
</p>
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 </p>
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 </p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Panoma Corp.',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/349/44/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '98987',
	(int) 1 => 'natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/98987/natural-gas-pipeline-co-vs-panoma-corp'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'Apr',
	(int) 1 => '11',
	(int) 2 => '1955'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp. - 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U.S. 44 (1955)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corporation
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Argued March 28-29, 1955
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided April 11, 1955
 
 *
 
</b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
 349 U.S. 44
 </b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OKLAHOMA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 A State may not fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce, because such .sale and transportation are subject to regulation by the Federal Power Commission exclusively.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 271 P.2d 354 and 272 P.2d 425 reversed.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 PER CURIAM.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 In this case, Oklahoma has attempted to fix a minimum price to be paid for natural gas, after its production and gathering has ended, by a company which transports the gas for resale in interstate commerce. We held in
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , that
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 349 U. S. 45
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
 such a sale and transportation cannot be regulated by a State, but are subject to the exclusive regulation of the Federal Power Commission. The
 <em>
 Phillips
 </em>
 case therefore controls this one. We disagree with the contention of the appellees that
 <em>
 Cities Service Gas Co. v. Peerless Oil and Gas Co.,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 179
 </a>
</span>
 , and
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Oklahoma,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 340 U. S. 190
 </a>
</span>
 , are applicable here. In those cases, we were dealing with constitutional questions, and not the construction of the Natural Gas Act. The latter question was specifically not passed upon in those cases.
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
<em>
 Reversed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, being of opinion that State regulation of price is permissible until the Federal price regulation permitted by
 <em>
 Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Wisconsin,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 347 U. S. 672
 </a>
</span>
 , is imposed, dissents. MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 * Together with No. 321,
 <em>
 Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.,
 </em>
 also on appeal from the same court, argued March 29, 1955.
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 17
$i = (int) 16
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Court	US Supreme Court
Decided On	Apr-11-1955
Case Number	349 U.S. 44
Appellant	Natural Gas Pipeline Co.
Respondent	Panoma Corp.

Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Vs. Panoma Corp. - Court Judgment