Faruque Ansari Alias Faruque Mian Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/983557
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnAug-12-2013
AppellantFaruque Ansari Alias Faruque Mian
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no.4047 of 2013 faruque ansari @ faruque mian @ md.faruque ansari.....................petitioner versus state of jharkhand ... opposite party coram: honble mr.justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner: mr.a.k.das for the state :a.p.p 4.12.8.13. heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the state. the petitioner is an accused in govindpur p.s. case no.274 of 2010 registered under section 395 of the indian penal code. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is the case of the prosecution that when six accused persons committed dacoity in a petrol pump, a case was registered against unknown. during investigation, this petitioner was booked in this case on the basis of confession made by the co-accused but that confession does not have any evidentiary value. moreover, save and except the statement made by the co-accused, nothing is there showing complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence. regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3rd additional sessions judge, dhanbad in s.t. no.150 of 2013 arising out of govindpur p.s. case no.274 of 2010 (g.r.no.2522 a of 2010). ( r. r. prasad, j.) nd/
Judgment:

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi B.A. No.4047 of 2013 Faruque Ansari @ Faruque Mian @ Md.Faruque Ansari.....................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner: Mr.A.K.Das For the State :A.P.P 4.12.8.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State. The petitioner is an accused in Govindpur P.S. case no.274 of 2010 registered under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is the case of the prosecution that when six accused persons committed dacoity in a petrol pump, a case was registered against unknown. During investigation, this petitioner was booked in this case on the basis of confession made by the co-accused but that confession does not have any evidentiary value. Moreover, save and except the statement made by the co-accused, nothing is there showing complicity of the petitioner in the alleged offence. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Dhanbad in S.T. No.150 of 2013 arising out of Govindpur P.S. case no.274 of 2010 (G.R.No.2522 A of 2010). ( R. R. Prasad, J.) ND/