Manoj Kumar and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.20523 o”1. manoj kumar, son of murari prasad, resident of village / mohalla new yarpur (dr. n.c. ghosh lane) 2. manish kumar, son of saryug prasad azad, resident of mohalla janta road. both p.s. gardanibagh, district patna. . petitioners versus the state of bihar . opp. party ---------------------------------”11. 01.2012 heard sri y.c. verma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and sri kumar uday pratap, learned additional public prosecutor. in the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of an order dated 14.06.2011 passed by f.t.c. i, patna in sessions trial no. 1240 of 2007 arising out of gardanibagh p.s. case no. 927 of 2005 instituted under section 302 of the indian penal code. by the said order the learned trial judge has rejected the petition filed under section 227 of the cr.p.c. for their discharge. i have perused the order. there is no infirmity in the order. the petition stands dismissed. praful ( rakesh kumar, j.)

Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20523 o”

1. Manoj Kumar, Son of Murari Prasad, Resident of Village / Mohalla New Yarpur (Dr. N.C. Ghosh Lane) 2. Manish Kumar, Son of Saryug Prasad Azad, Resident of Mohalla Janta Road. Both P.S. Gardanibagh, District Patna. . Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar . Opp. Party ---------------------------------”

11. 01.2012 Heard Sri Y.C. Verma, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Sri Kumar Uday Pratap, learned Additional Public Prosecutor. In the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of an order dated 14.06.2011 passed by F.T.C. I, Patna in Sessions Trial No. 1240 of 2007 arising out of Gardanibagh P.S. Case No. 927 of 2005 instituted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. By the said order the learned trial judge has rejected the petition filed under Section 227 of the Cr.P.C. for their discharge. I have perused the order. There is no infirmity in the order. The petition stands dismissed. Praful ( Rakesh Kumar, J.)