Surendra Ram @ Surendra Kumar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.43103 o”1. surendra ram @ surendra kumar 2. munna ram @ munna kumar, both s/o shri bharat ram 3. santosh ram @ santosh kumar, s/o nagendra ram 4. manoj ram @ manoj kumar, s/o shri harendra ram versus the state of bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 it has been submitted that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 have been arrested and, therefore, the application on their behalf has become infructuous. heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the state. the petitioner nos.3 and 4 seek anticipatory bail in sone nagar rail p.s. case no.7 of 2011 instituted for the offence u/ss.147, 149, 341, 323, 207, 354, 509, 379 and 427 of the indian penal code. considering the nature of allegations, i am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos.3 and 4. the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner nos.3 and 4 is rejected. narendra/ ( anjana prakash, j.)

Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.43103 o”

1. Surendra Ram @ Surendra Kumar 2. Munna Ram @ Munna Kumar, both S/o Shri Bharat Ram 3. Santosh Ram @ Santosh Kumar, S/o Nagendra Ram 4. Manoj Ram @ Manoj Kumar, S/o Shri Harendra Ram Versus The State Of Bihar ---------------------------------- 2. 13.1.2012 It has been submitted that the petitioner nos.1 and 2 have been arrested and, therefore, the application on their behalf has become infructuous. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioner nos.3 and 4 seek anticipatory bail in Sone Nagar Rail P.S. case No.7 of 2011 instituted for the offence u/ss.147, 149, 341, 323, 207, 354, 509, 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner nos.3 and 4. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner nos.3 and 4 is rejected. Narendra/ ( Anjana Prakash, J.

)