Ramesh Kumar Vs. the Union of India and ors - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
in the high court of judicature at patna letters patent appeal no.1719 of 2011 in civil writ jurisdiction case no. 6621 of 2007 with interlocutory application no. 7897 of 2011 in letters patent appeal no. 1719 of 2011 ====================================================== ramesh kumar, s/o late s.d. rai of village- chakakoo, p.o.- satpura, via + p.s.- bhagwanpur, district- vaishali (bihar). .... .... appellant/petitioner versus 1. the union of india through the secretary (a.f.) defence deptt., new delhi 2. the chief engineer (af) pin-900137, c/o 5.apo 3.the chief engineer hq, central command, pin - 900450, c/o 5.apo 4.cwe (af), bamrauli 5. age (1) (a f), bihar .... .... respondents/ respondents ====================================================== appearance : for the appellant/s : mr. anwar karim, advocate. for the respondent/s : mr. binay kumar pandey, c.g.c. ====================================================== coram: honourable the chief justice and honourable mr. justice birendra prasad verma oral order (per: honourable the chief justice”24. 01-2012 learned advocate has failed to amend the cause title pursuant to our order dated 5th january 2012. the cause title submitted by the learned advocate is also not complete. neither the respondents names are entered nor the complete designation or the postal addresses where they can be served. such cause title cannot be said to be complete cause title. for non-compliance of the order dated 5 th january 2012, the appeal and the application stood dismissed for non- prosecution. (r.m. doshit, cj) sujit/- (birendra prasad verma, j.)

Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1719 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6621 of 2007 With Interlocutory Application No. 7897 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1719 of 2011 ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar, S/O Late S.D. Rai of Village- Chakakoo, P.O.- Satpura, Via + P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Vaishali (Bihar). .... .... Appellant/Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India through the Secretary (A.F.) Defence Deptt., New Delhi 2. The Chief Engineer (AF) Pin-900137, C/O 5.APO 3.The Chief Engineer HQ, Central Command, Pin - 900450, C/O 5.APO 4.CWE (AF), Bamrauli 5. AGE (1) (A F), Bihar .... .... Respondents/ Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anwar Karim, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey, C.G.C. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE”

24. 01-2012 Learned advocate has failed to amend the cause title pursuant to our order dated 5th January 2012. The cause title submitted by the learned advocate is also not complete. Neither the respondents names are entered nor the complete designation or the postal addresses where they can be served. Such cause title cannot be said to be complete cause title. For non-compliance of the order dated 5 th January 2012, the Appeal and the application stood dismissed for non- prosecution. (R.M. Doshit, CJ) Sujit/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J.)