Manish Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/974225
SubjectCriminal
CourtPatna High Court
Decided OnMay-24-2012
AppellantManish Kumar
RespondentThe State of Bihar
Excerpt:
patna high court cr.misc. no.3472 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.3472 of 2012 ====================================================== manish kumar .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. shiva shankar sharma, adv. for the opposite party/s : mr. md. arif, app ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice aditya kumar trivedi oral order (per: honourable mr. justice aditya kumar trivedi”24. 01-2012 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned additional p.p. for the state. in the background of election dispute coming since before and in the background of a case bearing dhansoi p.s. case no. 22/2006 was already pending since before, it has been alleged that petitioner along with others came, assaulted, took away cash and during said course, it has been alleged against the petitioner to have pressed the neck. they also prevented the informant from taking legal recourse at an earliest. submission is of false implication on account of long standing enmity prevailing amongst parties since before. as per annexure-2 series, the injuries sustained by informant as well as others have been found simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. petitioner also happens to be in custody since patna high court cr.misc. no.3472 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 19.9.2011. in the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, manish kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of additional sessions judge, ftc-v, buxar in connection with s.tr. no. 284/2011 arising out of dhansoi p.s. case no. 47/2011. however, it is made clear that subsequent involvement of petitioner in any criminal case will disentitle him to continue with the privilege. (aditya kumar trivedi, j.) perwez./-
Judgment:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3472 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3472 of 2012 ====================================================== Manish Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiva Shankar Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI”

24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional P.P. for the State. In the background of election dispute coming since before and in the background of a case bearing Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 22/2006 was already pending since before, it has been alleged that petitioner along with others came, assaulted, took away cash and during said course, it has been alleged against the petitioner to have pressed the neck. They also prevented the informant from taking legal recourse at an earliest. Submission is of false implication on account of long standing enmity prevailing amongst parties since before. As per Annexure-2 series, the injuries sustained by informant as well as others have been found simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. Petitioner also happens to be in custody since Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3472 of 2012 (2) dt.24-01-2012 19.9.2011. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner, Manish Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge, FTC-V, Buxar in connection with S.Tr. No. 284/2011 arising out of Dhansoi P.S. Case No. 47/2011. However, it is made clear that subsequent involvement of petitioner in any criminal case will disentitle him to continue with the privilege. (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) perwez./-