Tunni Manjhi @ Raju Manjhi and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/973615
CourtPatna High Court
Decided OnMay-18-2012
AppellantTunni Manjhi @ Raju Manjhi and ors.
RespondentThe State of Bihar
Excerpt:
patna high court cr.misc. no.2541 of 2012 (2) dt.18-01-2012 in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.2541 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. tunni manjhi @ raju manjhi son of rajesh manjhi, r/o kamla nehru nagar, p.s.- kotwali, district- patna 2. sarwan mahto son of late sita ram mahto, r/o amarpur paijaba, p.s.- mehdiganj, district- patna 3. lotha dome son of ram pravesh dome, r/o kadam kuan, p.s.- kadam kuan, district- patna .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s ====================================================== appearance : for the petitioner/s : mr. jay kumar, advocate for the opposite party/s : mr. app ====================================================== coram: honourable mr. justice.....
Judgment:
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2541 of 2012 (2) dt.18-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2541 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Tunni Manjhi @ Raju Manjhi son of Rajesh Manjhi, R/o Kamla Nehru Nagar, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Patna 2. Sarwan Mahto Son of Late Sita Ram Mahto, R/o Amarpur Paijaba, P.S.- Mehdiganj, District- Patna 3. Lotha Dome son of Ram Pravesh Dome, R/o Kadam Kuan, P.S.- Kadam Kuan, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMAā€¯

18. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case registered under Sections 399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code , sections 25(1-B), 26/35 of the Arms Act and Sections 3 and 5 of the Explosive Substance Act. Uncontroverted submission is that identically situated accused persons, namely, Md. Anam, Dipak Rai, Rakesh Kumar, Surendra Manjhi and Shiva Manhi have been admitted to bail by the different orders of this Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2541 of 2012 (2) dt.18-01-2012 the petitioner above named is directed to be released on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M./concerned Court, Patna City in connection with Agam Kuan P.S. Case No. 222 of 2011. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) avin/-