Mangilal Rawal Vs. State of Raj. and ors - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
1 in the high court of judicature for rajasthan at jodhpur s.b. civil writ petition no.13277/2012 (mangi lal rawal vs. state of raj. & ors.) date of order :19. 12.2012 hon'ble mr justice gopal krishan vyas mr. sukesh bahti, for the petitioner. heard learned counsel for the petitioner. in this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to award marks for state certificate of rajasthan ball badminton association, which is said to be affiliated to the ball badminton federation of india. whether the said game is recognized or not, it is not known because no documentary evidence is placed on record. in view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation along with provision of recognization of ball badminton by the state government. upon filing the said representation, it is expected from the respondents that the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law for providing the marks to the petitioner within one month from the date of filing representation. (gopal krishan vyas), j.arun

Judgment:
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.13277/2012 (Mangi Lal Rawal Vs. State of Raj. & Ors.) Date of Order :

19. 12.2012 HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GOPAL KRISHAN VYAS Mr. Sukesh Bahti, for the petitioner. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. In this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to award marks for state certificate of Rajasthan Ball Badminton Association, which is said to be affiliated to the Ball Badminton Federation of India. Whether the said game is recognized or not, it is not known because no documentary evidence is placed on record. In view of above, this writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file representation along with provision of recognization of Ball Badminton by the State Government. Upon filing the said representation, it is expected from the respondents that the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law for providing the marks to the petitioner within one month from the date of filing representation. (Gopal Krishan Vyas), J.

arun