Raj Kumar Ahuja Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi a.b.a.no.1934of2013 rajkumarahuja petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :mr.praveenshankardayal,advocate forthestate :a.p .p. 04/20.06.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. itrevealsfromthewrittenreportthatatatapickupvan207bearing registrationnot jh05ar2469,loadedwithporacoalpackedindifferentbags weighingabout8quintal,wasseizedbythepolice.thedriverofthevehicleas wellasownerofcoalwereapprehended. itissubmittedthatpetitionerhappenstobeownerofsaidpickupvan andhehas noconcernwiththe illegaltradeofcoal. itis evidentfromthe writtenreportitselfthatownerofcoalwasrajeshmalakarwhowasarrestedon thespot. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. consideringthefactsandcircumstances,quantityofcoal beingcarried onthepickupvan,ifeelinclinedtogivebenefitofsection438cr.p.c.tothe petitioner. accordingly,abovenamedpetitionerisdirectedtosurrenderbeforethe courtbelowwithinaperiodofthreeweeksfromtodayandonsuchsurrender he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/ (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned chief judicial magistrate, hazaribagh in connectionwithramgarhp.s.caseno.66of2013correspondingtog.r.case no.783of2013subjecttotheconditionslaiddownundersection438(2)cr.p.c. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Judgment:
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1934of2013 RajKumarAhuja Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.PraveenShankarDayal,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/20.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ItrevealsfromthewrittenreportthataTatapickupvan207bearing registrationnot JH05AR2469,loadedwithporacoalpackedindifferentbags weighingabout8quintal,wasseizedbythepolice.Thedriverofthevehicleas wellasownerofcoalwereapprehended. Itissubmittedthatpetitionerhappenstobeownerofsaidpickupvan andhehas noconcernwiththe illegaltradeofcoal. Itis evidentfromthe writtenreportitselfthatownerofcoalwasRajeshMalakarwhowasarrestedon thespot. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringthefactsandcircumstances,quantityofcoal beingcarried onthepickupvan,IfeelinclinedtogivebenefitofSection438Cr.P.C.tothe petitioner. Accordingly,abovenamedpetitionerisdirectedtosurrenderbeforethe Courtbelowwithinaperiodofthreeweeksfromtodayandonsuchsurrender he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh in connectionwithRamgarhP.S.CaseNo.66of2013correspondingtoG.R.Case No.783of2013subjecttotheconditionslaiddownunderSection438(2)Cr.P.C. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC