ishwar Chaudhary Vs. the State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/972320
CourtJharkhand High Court
Decided OnDec-19-2012
Appellantishwar Chaudhary
RespondentThe State of Jharkhand
Excerpt:
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no.8791 of 2012 --- 1. ishwar chaudhary 2. chandreshekhar mahto 3. meghanath mahto 4. dashrath mahto 5. kailimuddin ansar @ kalim 6. mahfuz ansari 7. anwar ansari ... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand opposite party --- coram : hon'ble mr. justice alok singh --- for the petitioners : mr. raj mangal singh, advocate for the opposite party : mr. tripati nath verma, a.p.p. --- 02 /19.12.2012 present bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with rajganj p.s. case no.61 of 2012, corresponding to g.r. no.3588 of 2012 registered under sections 414, 467, 468, 471, 473, 419, 420 of the indian penal code. learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that all the offences are triable by the magistrate and after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted. he further submits that there is no public witness of the incident and all the alleged witnesses are the public servants. therefore, there is no apprehension of extending threat to the public officers (witnesses) of the case. considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, i direct let petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing respective personal bonds and two sureties of rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, dhanbad in connection with rajganj p.s. case no.61 of 2012, corresponding to g.r. no.3588 of 2012. (alok singh, j.) r.k./ shanant
Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No.8791 of 2012 --- 1. Ishwar Chaudhary 2. Chandreshekhar Mahto 3. Meghanath Mahto 4. Dashrath Mahto 5. Kailimuddin Ansar @ Kalim 6. Mahfuz Ansari 7. Anwar Ansari ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Raj Mangal Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Tripati Nath Verma, A.P.P. --- 02 /19.12.2012 Present Bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No.61 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.3588 of 2012 registered under Sections 414, 467, 468, 471, 473, 419, 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that all the offences are triable by the Magistrate and after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted. He further submits that there is no public witness of the incident and all the alleged witnesses are the public servants. Therefore, there is no apprehension of extending threat to the public officers (witnesses) of the case. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, I direct let petitioners, named above, be released on bail on furnishing respective personal bonds and two sureties of Rs.10,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No.61 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.3588 of 2012. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K./ Shanant