Judgment:IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 3652 of 2006 Nakuldeo Prasad...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & others ..Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent Nos. : J.
C. to S.C.I -- 04/6.3.2013 Itappears thatthe matterhad been referred toLok Adalat earlier. Thewritpetitionwasinrelationtopaymentofretirement benefitsandotherconsequentialbenefitslikeG.P.F.etc. Fromthe statements made in paragraph 8 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondentno. 5 and the submission of the learned counselappearingonhisbehalf,itappearsthatthepetitioner'sclaim hasbeensettledinrelationtoenhancementofscaleunderACPand interestonG.P.F.paymentofT.A.hasalreadybeenissuedinhis favour. It further appears that in the Lok Adalat held on 19th January,2008thepetitionerhadappearedandacceptedtheChequeof Rs.6,340/andRs.5,619/andalsomadeendorsementthathedoes nothaveanyobjectioninrespectofthesame. Accordingly,itappearsthatthegrievancesofthepetitioner havebeenredressed.Thewritpetitionisdisposedofasinfructuous. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) jk