SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/94731 |
Court | US Supreme Court |
Decided On | May-31-1927 |
Case Number | 274 U.S. 543 |
Appellant | Ftc |
Respondent | American Tobacco Co. |
Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]Code Context}
//highest occurence of word in the judgement
echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' )include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]ftc v. american tobacco co. - 274 u.s. 543 (1927) u.s. supreme court ftc v. american tobacco co., 274 u.s. 543 (1927) ftc v. american tobacco company no. 279 argued april 19, 20, 1927 decided may 31, 1927 274 u.s. 543 certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the second circuit syllabus a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. p. 274 u. s. 544 . 9 f.2d 570 affirmed. certiorari (270 u.s. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the federal trade commission. page 274 u. s. 544 .....Code Context}
//highest occurence of word in the judgement
echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' )include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 0include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
FTC v. American Tobacco Company
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 1include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
No. 279
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 2include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Argued April 19, 20, 1927
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 3include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Decided May 31, 1927
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 4include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
274 U.S. 543
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 5include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 6include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 7include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 8include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Syllabus
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 9include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. 274 U. S. 544 .
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 10include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
9 F.2d 570 affirmed.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 11include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 12include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 13include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 14include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 15include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 16include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 9 F.2d 570.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 17include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 18include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 19include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109
Affirmed.
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Contextecho $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect');
}
echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp' $dataForView = array( 'title_for_layout' => 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ', 'desc' => array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a href="/case/94732/joines-vs-patterson"> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a class="page-number" id="544"> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ), 'casename_url' => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co', 'args' => array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) ) $title_for_layout = 'Ftc Vs American Tobacco Co - Citation 94731 - Court Judgment | ' $desc = array( 'Judgement' => array( 'id' => '94731', 'acts' => null, 'appealno' => '274 U.S. 543', 'appellant' => 'Ftc', 'authreffered' => null, 'casename' => 'Ftc Vs. American Tobacco Co.', 'casenote' => '', 'caseanalysis' => null, 'casesref' => null, 'citingcases' => null, 'counselplain' => null, 'counseldef' => null, 'court' => 'US Supreme Court', 'court_type' => 'FN', 'decidedon' => '1927-05-31', 'deposition' => null, 'favorof' => null, 'findings' => null, 'judge' => null, 'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> </p> <p> <b> No. 279 </b> </p> <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> </p> <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> </p> <p> <b> </b> </p> <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> </p> <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> </p> <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> </p> <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . </p> <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. </p> <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. </p> <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> </p> <p> </p> <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. </p> <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. </p> <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. </p> <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. </p> <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. </p> <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> </p> <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>', 'observations' => null, 'overruledby' => null, 'prhistory' => null, 'pubs' => null, 'ratiodecidendi' => null, 'respondent' => 'American Tobacco Co.', 'sub' => null, 'link' => '/cases/federal/us/274/543/', 'circuit' => null ) ) $casename_url = 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $args = array( (int) 0 => '94731', (int) 1 => 'ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' ) $url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/94731/ftc-vs-american-tobacco-co' $ctype = '' $date = array( (int) 0 => 'May', (int) 1 => '31', (int) 2 => '1927' ) $content = array( (int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div> FTC v. American Tobacco Co. - 274 U.S. 543 (1927) <br/> <span> U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. American Tobacco Co., 274 U.S. 543 (1927) </span> <p> <b> FTC v. American Tobacco Company </b> ', (int) 1 => ' <p> <b> No. 279 </b> ', (int) 2 => ' <p> <b> Argued April 19, 20, 1927 </b> ', (int) 3 => ' <p> <b> Decided May 31, 1927 </b> ', (int) 4 => ' <p> <b> 274 U.S. 543 </b> ', (int) 5 => ' <p> <b> </b> ', (int) 6 => ' <p> <em> CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS </em> ', (int) 7 => ' <p> <em> FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT </em> ', (int) 8 => ' <p> <em> </em> <em> Syllabus </em> ', (int) 9 => ' <p> A judgment of the circuit court of appeals which turns on a matter of fact of no general importance, depending on an appreciation of circumstance admitting of different interpretations, will not be revised by certiorari. P. <span> <a> 274 U. S. 544 </a> </span> . ', (int) 10 => ' <p> 9 F.2d 570 affirmed. ', (int) 11 => ' <p> Certiorari (270 U.S. 638) to a judgment of the circuit court of appeals which set aside an order of the Federal Trade Commission. ', (int) 12 => ' <p> <a> Page 274 U. S. 544 </a> ', (int) 13 => ' <p> ', (int) 14 => ' <p> MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court. ', (int) 15 => ' <p> The statement of the petition for certiorari that the judgment and opinion below might seriously hinder future administration of the law was grave and sufficiently probable to justify issuance of the writ. ', (int) 16 => ' <p> Proper decision of the controversy depends upon a question of fact. Did the American Tobacco Company become party to the unlawful combination of tobacco jobbers at Philadelphia to maintain prices? After considering much evidence, the commission gave affirmative answer to that query, but the circuit court of appeals thought there was nothing to support their view. <em> American Tobacco Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, </em> 9 F.2d 570. ', (int) 17 => ' <p> It now appears to us that this matter of fact is of no general importance. Accordingly, we adhere to the usual rule of noninterference where conclusions of circuit courts of appeals depend on appreciation of circumstances which admit of different interpretations, and upon that ground alone, we affirm the judgment below. ', (int) 18 => ' <p> The opinion of the circuit court of appeals is of uncertain intendment, and is not satisfactory as an exposition of the law. What this Court has said in many opinions indicates clearly enough the general purpose of the statute and the necessity of applying it with strict regard thereto. ', (int) 19 => ' <p> <em> Affirmed. </em> ', (int) 20 => ' <br/> <br/> </div></body></html>' ) $paragraphAfter = (int) 1 $cnt = (int) 21 $i = (int) 20include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144 View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971 View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933 View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473 Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963 Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200 Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167 [main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109