Commissioner of Customs, Chennai Vs. M/S.Micro Labs Ltd. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/943417
CourtCustoms Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided OnOct-07-2009
Case NumberAppeal No.C/351 of 2005
Judge THE HONOURABLE MS. JYOTI BALASUNDARAM, VICE PRESIDENT
AppellantCommissioner of Customs, Chennai
RespondentM/S.Micro Labs Ltd.
Advocates:Ms. Indira Sisupal, JDR. Shri T.V. Suresh Kumar, Adv.
Excerpt:
the respondents herein presented a bill of entry dated 12.01.2005 for assessment and clearance of measuring tapes along with other goods like stethoscope holder and testing pin etc. for the import of measuring tapes, registration with the department of weights and measures in accordance with the standards of weights and measures act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as swm act) was required. since the importer was not so registered, the measuring tapes were held to be liable for confiscation. show-cause notice was waived and personal hearing was granted to the importers by the additional commissioner of customs who held that the registration was mandatory for export or import of any weight or measure under section 47 of the swm act. he, therefore, ordered confiscation under section 111 (d).....
Judgment:

The respondents herein presented a bill of entry dated 12.01.2005 for assessment and clearance of measuring tapes along with other goods like stethoscope holder and testing pin etc. For the import of measuring tapes, registration with the Department of Weights and Measures in accordance with the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as SWM Act) was required. Since the importer was not so registered, the measuring tapes were held to be liable for confiscation. Show-cause notice was waived and personal hearing was granted to the importers by the Additional Commissioner of Customs who held that the registration was mandatory for export or import of any weight or measure under Section 47 of the SWM Act. He, therefore, ordered confiscation under Section 111 (d) of the Customs Act, 1962 read with Section 47 of the SWM Act, 1976 with an option to redeem the goods on payment of a fine of Rs.80,000/- along with applicable duty, and also imposed a penalty of Rs.20,000/- on the importer under Section 112 (a) ibid. The Commissioner (Appeals) accepted the contention of the importers that they were neither dealers nor manufacturers and set aside the adjudication order, hence this appeal by the Revenue.

2. I have heard both sides. In terms of Section 47(1), no dealer or manufacturer shall export or import any weight or measure unless he is registered under the Section as such exporter or importer as the case may be. Section 2 (c) of the SWM Act defines a dealer as a person who, or a firm or a Hindu Undivided Family, which carried on, directly or otherwise, the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing any such weight or measure, whether for cash or for deferred payment or for commission, remuneration or other valuable consideration, and includes”

(i) a commission agent who carries on such business on behalf of any principal,

(ii) an importer who sells, supplies, distributes or otherwise delivers any weight or measure to any user, manufacturer, repairer, consumer or any other person,

but does not include a manufacturer who sells, supplies, distributes or otherwise delivers any weight or measure to any person or category of persons referred to in this clause.

3. In the light of the above, the importers clearly fall within the definition of dealer as importers who distribute weights or measures and do not fall under the excluded category as they are not manufacturers of weights and measures. Since the importers fall within the definition of dealer under the SWM Act, registration is mandatory and since they did not possess a Registration Certificate, the Additional Commissioner rightly held that the goods were liable to confiscation and the importers liable to penalty. I, therefore, set aside the impugned order and allow the appeal.