M/S. Heg Ltd. Vs. Cst, Indore - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/942367
CourtCustoms Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided OnFeb-26-2010
Case NumberE/2073 of 1999
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. D.N. Panda, Judicial Member the Honourable Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Member (Technical)
AppellantM/S. Heg Ltd.
RespondentCst, Indore
Advocates:Sh. Ravi Raghvan, Adv. For Appellants. Sh. Anil Khanna, DR for Respondent
Excerpt:
ld. counsel shri ravi raghvan mentions that he is engaged in this case and awaiting the vakalatnama from the appellant heg ltd. who were before the hon ble high court of m.p. as respondent in cer.1/2002. he expresses the difficulty that he being engaged for the first time in this case, he would require four weeks time to get the file from the appellant and also with the co-operation of revenue, he shall draw the statement of case for consideration of the bench. accordingly, he prays that if the matter is called on 26.3.2010, both sides shall be able to settle the draft and place before the tribunal for appropriate consideration and finality. 2. we notice that revenue although was in appeal before the high court of madhya pradesh, there is no concern shown by them today without coming out with a draft statement of facts for consideration by the bench. 3. in view of the aforesaid difficulties and the matter having travelled for long time with series of litigation, it would be proper for both the sides to come out with a draft as suggested by shri ravi raghvan, learned counsel by the date aforesaid without further delay. accordingly, the matter shall be called on 26.3.2010 for final disposal.
Judgment:

Ld. Counsel Shri Ravi Raghvan mentions that he is engaged in this case and awaiting the Vakalatnama from the appellant HEG Ltd. who were before the Hon ble High Court of M.P. as respondent in CER.1/2002. He expresses the difficulty that he being engaged for the first time in this case, he would require four weeks time to get the file from the appellant and also with the co-operation of Revenue, he shall draw the statement of case for consideration of the Bench. Accordingly, he prays that if the matter is called on 26.3.2010, both sides shall be able to settle the draft and place before the Tribunal for appropriate consideration and finality.

2. We notice that revenue although was in appeal before the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, there is no concern shown by them today without coming out with a draft statement of facts for consideration by the Bench.

3. In view of the aforesaid difficulties and the matter having travelled for long time with series of litigation, it would be proper for both the sides to come out with a draft as suggested by Shri Ravi Raghvan, learned Counsel by the date aforesaid without further delay. Accordingly, the matter shall be called on 26.3.2010 for final disposal.