M/S.DolphIn Electronics Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/941662
CourtCustoms Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided OnNov-04-2009
Case NumberAppeal No.C/314 of 2004
Judge THE HONOURABLE DR. CHITTARANJAN SATAPATHY, TECHNICAL MEMBER & THE HONOURABLE MR. P.K. DAS, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AppellantM/S.DolphIn Electronics
RespondentCommissioner of Customs, Chennai
Advocates:Ms. Indira Sisupal, JDR
Excerpt:
per p.k. das none appears on behalf of the appellant. the learned counsel on behalf of the appellant filed an adjournment application on the ground that he is going out of station for medical check-up as per doctor’s advice. no copy of doctor’s advice was enclosed with the letter. on perusal of the record, we find that the matter was adjourned on 09.09.2009 at the request of the learned counsel. it is also noted that on 09.06.2009, it was adjourned by way of last chance. even thereafter, the matter was adjourned on two occasions at their request. it appears that the matter was adjourned on different occasions on various grounds. it seems that the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter. hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Judgment:

Per P.K. Das

None appears on behalf of the appellant. The learned counsel on behalf of the appellant filed an adjournment application on the ground that he is going out of station for medical check-up as per doctor’s advice. No copy of doctor’s advice was enclosed with the letter. On perusal of the record, we find that the matter was adjourned on 09.09.2009 at the request of the learned counsel. It is also noted that on 09.06.2009, it was adjourned by way of last chance. Even thereafter, the matter was adjourned on two occasions at their request. It appears that the matter was adjourned on different occasions on various grounds. It seems that the appellant is not interested to pursue the matter. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.