Ranjana Mehta Vs. Union of India Through the Chief Secretary and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/939162
CourtCentral Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided OnMay-21-2009
Case NumberOA No. 1381 of 2009
Judge V.K. BALI, CHAIRMAN & THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VEENA CHHOTRAY, ADMINISTRATIVE MEMBER
AppellantRanjana Mehta
RespondentUnion of India Through the Chief Secretary and Another
Advocates:For the Appellant: M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. For the Respondent: -------.
Excerpt:
(oral) justice v.k. bali, chairman: when confronted with the position that present original application is barred by time as provided under section 21 of administrative tribunals act, 1985 and the same is not even accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay, counsel states that there are sufficient reasons for condonation of delay but somehow the applicant missed out to file the application. he, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this original application with liberty to file fresh one for the same cause of action which shall be accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay. 2. with leave and liberty, as asked for, this original application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Judgment:

(ORAL)

Justice V.K. Bali, Chairman:

When confronted with the position that present Original Application is barred by time as provided under Section 21 of Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and the same is not even accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay, counsel states that there are sufficient reasons for condonation of delay but somehow the applicant missed out to file the application. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw this Original Application with liberty to file fresh one for the same cause of action which shall be accompanied by an application seeking condonation of delay.

2. With leave and liberty, as asked for, this Original Application is dismissed as withdrawn.