Urmila Devi and Another Vs. the Union of India (Through Secretary), New Delhi and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/938870
CourtCentral Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided OnNov-02-2011
Case NumberOA No. 476 of 2011
JudgeTHE HONOURABLE DR. DHARAM PAUL SHARMA, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AppellantUrmila Devi and Another
RespondentThe Union of India (Through Secretary), New Delhi and Others
Advocates:For the Applicants: V.P.S. Tyagi, Advocate. For the Respondents: R.N. Singh, Advocate.
Excerpt:
(oral) 1. the claim of the applicant in this application is for compassionate appointment. subsequent to filing of this application, the applicant was in receipt of respondents’ communication dated 17.1.2011, whereby the applicant was informed of the result of consideration of his case by the screening committee, whereby his claim did not find any merit due to other cases being more deserving. the applicant, however, was also informed that his case would further be considered in the next screening committee subject to availability of vacancies for the purpose of compassionate appointment. 2. since the applicant’s case is being considered by the respondents, there is no lis between the parties which survives for consideration in the present application, the applicant’s counsel states that the applicant would be satisfied if the respondents inform him of the result of the consideration of his case by the subsequent meeting of the screening committee, to which respondents’ counsel does not have any objection. as a matter of fact, as and when such meetings are held, the results thereof would be informed to the concerned in due course. the applicant will, however, have liberty to seek redressal for any further grievance remains. 3. the original application is disposed of in the above terms.
Judgment:

(ORAL)

1. The claim of the applicant in this Application is for compassionate appointment. Subsequent to filing of this Application, the applicant was in receipt of respondents’ communication dated 17.1.2011, whereby the applicant was informed of the result of consideration of his case by the Screening Committee, whereby his claim did not find any merit due to other cases being more deserving. The applicant, however, was also informed that his case would further be considered in the next Screening Committee subject to availability of vacancies for the purpose of compassionate appointment.

2. Since the applicant’s case is being considered by the respondents, there is no lis between the parties which survives for consideration in the present Application, the applicant’s counsel states that the applicant would be satisfied if the respondents inform him of the result of the consideration of his case by the subsequent meeting of the Screening Committee, to which respondents’ counsel does not have any objection. As a matter of fact, as and when such meetings are held, the results thereof would be informed to the concerned in due course. The applicant will, however, have liberty to seek redressal for any further grievance remains.

3. The Original Application is disposed of in the above terms.