Pandu Son of Makbul Vs. the Station House Officer. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/925657
CourtKarnataka High Court
Decided OnMar-12-2012
Case NumberCRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1363 OF 2012
JudgeSUBHASH B ADI, J.
AppellantPandu Son of Makbul
RespondentThe Station House Officer.
Advocates:SRI. R, K. MAHADEVA, ADV.
Excerpt:
[subhash b adi, j.] crl.p filed u/s.438 cr.p.c praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail of the event of his arrest in cr.no.42/11 of mandi mohalla p.s., mysore city, for the offences p/u/s 143, 144, 147, 307, 302 r/w 149 of ipc.1. the petitioner m accused no.5, he is seeking antsipatory bail in respect of crime no.42/2011 registered by mandi police, mysore city, fox the offences punishable under section 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 302 r/w section 149 of ipc.2. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused nos.2, 3 find 6 to 11 have been granted bail and anticipatory bail. he haw else produced copies of the orders passed by the court.3. having regard to the same, i find that this petitioner could also v« granted anticipatory bail subject to certain conditions.4. accordingly, the petition is allowed. the petitioner is granted anticipatory ball subject to the certain conditions:1) in the event of his arrest in crime no. 42/2011 of mandi police station, mysore city, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond far a sum of 25,000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.2) the petitioner shall cooperate with the i.o. far investigation as and when required.3) the petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.
Judgment:

1. The petitioner m accused No.5, He is seeking antsipatory bail in respect of Crime No.42/2011 registered by Mandi Police, Mysore City, fox the offences punishable under Section 143, 144, 147, 148, 307, 302 r/w Section 149 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused Nos.2, 3 find 6 to 11 have been granted bail and anticipatory bail. He haw else produced copies of the orders passed by the Court.

3. Having regard to the same, I find that this petitioner could also V« granted anticipatory bail subject to certain conditions.

4. Accordingly, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is granted anticipatory ball subject to the certain conditions:

1) In the event of his arrest in Crime No. 42/2011 of Mandi Police Station, Mysore City, the petitioner shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond far a sum of 25,000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.

2) The petitioner shall cooperate with the I.O. far investigation as and when required.

3) The petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses.