| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/921922 |
| Court | Jharkhand High Court |
| Decided On | Oct-11-2011 |
| Appellant | Onkar Singh @ Omkar Singh @ Sanni Singh @ Sanni Sardar |
| Respondent | State of Jharkhand |
Excerpt:
c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a no. 6827 of 2011 ------onkar singh @ omkar singh @ sanni singh @ sanni sardar .. -versusthe state of jharkhand coram : -----honble mr. justice h.c.mishra -----for the petitioner : mr.a.k.sahani, advocate for the state : mr.d.k.prasad, a.p.p. ------petitioner.... opposite party2/ 11.10.2011 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the state. the petitioner has been made accused in bokaro steel city p.s case no.174 of 2011 corresponding to g.r no.638 of 2011 for the offence under sections 399, 402, 413 and 414 of the indian penal code. it appears that the petitioner along-with other culprits were apprehended by the police on a vehicle which was found to be stolen and it also appears that the petitioner and the co-accused persons admitted their involvement in some cases of road robbery , dacoity etc. from the possession of the petitioner, fire arm was also recovered, for which, it appears that separate case was instituted. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has prayed for bail. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner onkar singh @ omkar singh @ sanni singh @ sanni sardar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, bokaro in bokaro steel city p.s case no.174 of 2011 corresponding to g.r no.638 of 2011.(h.c.mishra, j.)b.s/
Judgment:IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6827 of 2011 ------Onkar Singh @ Omkar Singh @ Sanni Singh @ Sanni Sardar .. -VersusThe State of Jharkhand CORAM : -----HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the State : Mr.D.K.Prasad, A.P.P. ------
Petitioner
.... Opposite Party
2/ 11.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Bokaro Steel City P.S case no.174 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No.638 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 399, 402, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the petitioner along-with other culprits were apprehended by the police on a vehicle which was found to be stolen and it also appears that the petitioner and the co-accused persons admitted their involvement in some cases of road robbery , dacoity etc. From the possession of the petitioner, fire arm was also recovered, for which, it appears that separate case was instituted. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has prayed for bail. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Onkar Singh @ Omkar Singh @ Sanni Singh @ Sanni Sardar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro in Bokaro Steel City P.S case no.174 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No.638 of 2011.
(H.C.Mishra, J.)
B.S/