Mills Vs. Johnson - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/90783
SubjectOther Taxes
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On1909
Case Number215 U.S. 590
AppellantMills
RespondentJohnson
Excerpt:
mills v. johnson - 215 u.s. 590 (1909) u.s. supreme court mills v. johnson, 215 u.s. 590 (1909) 215 u.s. 590 mrs. emma g. mills, and her husband, harry mills, plaintiffs in error, v. mrs. m. e. v. johnson and husband, l. a. johnson, j. h. h. burk, at al. no. 36. supreme court of the united states december 13, 1909 messrs. frederic d. mckenney and r. s. neblett for plaintiffs in error. messrs. richard mays, robert e. prince, and w. s. simpkins for defendants in error. per curiam: writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. beale v. johnson, 45 tex. civ. app. 119, 99 s. w. 1045; waters-pierce oil co. v. texas, 212 u.s. 86 , 53 l. ed. 417, 29 sup. ct. rep. 220; waters pierce oil co. v. texas, 212 u.s. 112 , 53 l. ed. 431, 29 sup. ct. rep. 227; mccorquodale v. texas, 211 u.s. 432 , 53 l. ed. 269, 29 sup. ct. rep. 146; cox v. texas, 202 u.s. 446 , 50 l. ed. 1099, 26 sup. ct. rep. 671; harding v. illinois, 196 u.s. 78 , 49 l. ed. 394, 25 sup. ct. rep. 176; arbuckle v. blackburn, 191 u.s. 405 , 48 l. ed. 239, 24 sup. ct. rep. 148.
Judgment:
MILLS v. JOHNSON - 215 U.S. 590 (1909)
U.S. Supreme Court MILLS v. JOHNSON, 215 U.S. 590 (1909)

215 U.S. 590

MRS. EMMA G. MILLS, and her husband, Harry Mills, Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MRS. M. E. V. JOHNSON and husband, L. A. Johnson, J. H. H. Burk, at al.
No. 36.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 13, 1909

Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney and R. S. Neblett for plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Richard Mays, Robert E. Prince, and W. S. Simpkins for defendants in error.

Per Curiam:

Writ of Error dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Beale v. Johnson, 45 Tex. Civ. App. 119, 99 S. W. 1045; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 86 , 53 L. ed. 417, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 220; Waters Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U.S. 112 , 53 L. ed. 431, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 227; McCorquodale v. Texas, 211 U.S. 432 , 53 L. ed. 269, 29 Sup. Ct. Rep. 146; Cox v. Texas, 202 U.S. 446 , 50 L. ed. 1099, 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 671; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U.S. 78 , 49 L. ed. 394, 25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 176; Arbuckle v. Blackburn, 191 U.S. 405 , 48 L. ed. 239, 24 Sup. Ct. Rep. 148.