Pittsburgh, C C and S L R Company Vs. Lightheiser - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/90570
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On1908
Case Number212 U.S. 560
AppellantPittsburgh, C C and S L R Company
RespondentLightheiser
Excerpt:
pittsburgh, c c & s l r company v. lightheiser - 212 u.s. 560 (1908) u.s. supreme court pittsburgh, c c & s l r company v. lightheiser, 212 u.s. 560 (1908) 212 u.s. 560 pittsburgh, cincinnati, chicago, & st. louis railway company, plaintiff in error, v. george w. lightheiser. no. 141. pittsburgh, cincinnati, chicago, & st. louis railway company, plaintiff in error, v. thomas collins. no. 142. pittsburgh, cincinnati, chicago, & st. louis railway company, plaintiff in error, v. william r. ross. no. 178. supreme court of the united states december 7, 1908 mr. allen zollars for plaintiff in error. mr. stewart t. mcconnell for defendants in error. per curiam: writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. tullis v. lake erie & w. r. co. 175 u.s. 348 , 44 l. ed. 192, 20 sup. ct. rep. 136; pittsburgh, c. c. & st. l. r. co. v. lightheiser, 168 ind. 438, 78 n. e. 1033; pittsburgh, c. c. & st. l. r. co. v. collins, 168 ind. 467, 80 n. e. 415; pittsburgh, c. c. & st. l. r. co. v. ross, 169 ind. 3, 80 n. e. 845.
Judgment:
PITTSBURGH, C C & S L R COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER - 212 U.S. 560 (1908)
U.S. Supreme Court PITTSBURGH, C C & S L R COMPANY v. LIGHTHEISER, 212 U.S. 560 (1908)

212 U.S. 560

PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
GEORGE W. LIGHTHEISER.
No. 141.

PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
THOMAS COLLINS.

No. 142.

PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO, & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
WILLIAM R. ROSS.

No. 178.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 7, 1908

Mr. Allen Zollars for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Stewart T. McConnell for defendants in error.

Per Curiam: Writs of error severally dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Tullis v. Lake Erie & W. R. Co. 175 U.S. 348 , 44 L. ed. 192, 20 Sup. Ct. Rep. 136; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Lightheiser, 168 Ind. 438, 78 N. E. 1033; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Collins, 168 Ind. 467, 80 N. E. 415; Pittsburgh, C. C. & St. L. R. Co. v. Ross, 169 Ind. 3, 80 N. E. 845.