Wolfe Vs. Hartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citationsooperkanoon.com/87344
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided OnMar-27-1893
Case Number148 U.S. 389
AppellantWolfe
RespondentHartford Life and Annuity Ins. Co.
Excerpt:
Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]
wolfe v. hartford life & annuity ins. co. - 148 u.s. 389 (1893) u.s. supreme court wolfe v. hartford life & annuity ins. co., 148 u.s. 389 (1893) wolfe v. hartford life and annuity insurance company no. 182 submitted march 23, 1893 decided march 27, 1893 148 u.s. 389 error to the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of new york syllabus a complaint which avers that the plaintiff was, at the several times named therein, "and ever since has been and still is a resident of the city, county and state of new york" is not sufficient to give the circuit court of that circuit jurisdiction on the ground of citizenship of the parties, when the record nowhere discloses the plaintiffs citizenship. .....
Judgment:
Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]
Wolfe v. Hartford Life & Annuity Ins. Co. - 148 U.S. 389 (1893)
U.S. Supreme Court Wolfe v. Hartford Life & Annuity Ins. Co., 148 U.S. 389 (1893)

Wolfe v. Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

No. 182

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

Submitted March 23, 1893

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

Decided March 27, 1893

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

148 U.S. 389

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

Syllabus

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

A complaint which avers that the plaintiff was, at the several times named therein, "and ever since has been and still is a resident of the city, county and State of New York" is not sufficient to give the circuit court of that circuit jurisdiction on the ground of citizenship of the parties, when the record nowhere discloses the plaintiffs citizenship.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

The case is stated in the opinion.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

THE CHIEF JUSTICE: The complaint in this case avers that the plaintiff was at the several times mentioned therein, "and ever since has been, and still is, a resident of the City, County, and State of New York," but his citizenship is nowhere disclosed by the record.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

It is essential, in cases where the jurisdiction depends upon the citizenship of the parties, that such citizenship or the facts which in legal intendment constitute it should be distinctly and positively averred in the pleadings or should appear with equal distinctness in other parts of the record. It is not sufficient that jurisdiction may be inferred argumentatively from the averments. Brown v. Keene, 8 Pet. 112, 33 U. S. 115 ; Continental Ins. Co. v. Rhoads, 119 U. S. 237 ; Menard v. Goggan, 121 U. S. 253 .

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]

Judgment reversed at the costs of plaintiff in error, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]