The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment

Excerpt:

Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120]Code Context                                echo "<div class='table-bordered'><b>Excerpt:</b><br/>";

                                    if (trim($desc['Judgement']['casenote'])) {

                                        echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['casenote']))), $query);
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120]Code Context                                echo "<div class='table-bordered'><b>Excerpt:</b><br/>";

                                    if (trim($desc['Judgement']['casenote'])) {

                                        echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['casenote']))), $query);
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

practice - committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--criminal procedure code (act x, 1872), sections 4, 220, 221. -

Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]Code Context                                    }

                                //highest occurence of word in the judgement

                                echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]Code Context                                    }

                                //highest occurence of word in the judgement

                                echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

l.s. jackson, j.1. 'trial,' according to the definition in section 4 of the criminal procedure code, means 'the proceedings taken in court after a charge has been drawn up.' it is clear, therefore, that section 221 of the criminal procedure code, which follows section 220, authorises a magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to section 220. it may be added that, though the explanation to section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the magistrate who drew it.2. we see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.

Judgment:

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 0
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

L.S. Jackson, J.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 1
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 2
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '871021',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '871021',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress Vs Kudrutoollah and ors - Citation 871021 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '871021',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'casenote' => 'Practice - Committal for trial after charge has been drawn up--Criminal Procedure Code (Act X, 1872), Sections 4, 220, 221. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1878-03-22',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.',
		'judgement' => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.</p><p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.</p><p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Kudrutoollah and ors.',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '871021',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/871021/empress-vs-kudrutoollah-ors'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>L.S. Jackson, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. 'Trial,' according to the definition in Section 4 of the Criminal Procedure Code, means 'the proceedings taken in Court after a charge has been drawn up.' It is clear, therefore, that Section 221 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which follows Section 220, authorises a Magistrate, although a charge may have been drawn up, to stop further proceedings and commit for trial: for this purpose Section 221 may be regarded as a proviso to Section 220. It may be added that, though the explanation to Section 220 provides that if a charge is drawn up, the prisoner must be either convicted or acquitted, it does not require that the conviction or acquittal should be by the Magistrate who drew it.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. We see no reason, therefore, to quash the commitment.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 3
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Subject	Criminal
Court	Kolkata
Decided On	Mar-22-1878
Judge	L.S. Jackson and ;Cunningham, J.
Appellant	The Empress
Respondent	Kudrutoollah and ors.

The Empress Vs. Kudrutoollah and ors. - Court Judgment