The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment

Excerpt:

Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120]Code Context                                echo "<div class='table-bordered'><b>Excerpt:</b><br/>";

                                    if (trim($desc['Judgement']['casenote'])) {

                                        echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['casenote']))), $query);
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120]Code Context                                echo "<div class='table-bordered'><b>Excerpt:</b><br/>";

                                    if (trim($desc['Judgement']['casenote'])) {

                                        echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['casenote']))), $query);
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 120
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

criminal procedure code (act x of 1872), section 90 - omission to give information to police of offence. -

Notice (8): Undefined variable: kword [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]Code Context                                    }

                                //highest occurence of word in the judgement

                                echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123]Code Context                                    }

                                //highest occurence of word in the judgement

                                echo $this->Wand->highlight($this->Excerpt->extractRelevant($kword,strtolower(strip_tags($desc['Judgement']['judgement']))), $query) . "</div>";
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 123
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

ainslie, j.1. the provisions of section 90 of the criminal procedure code and section 176 of the indian penal code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to magistrates and the police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: provided that information is conveyed to the nearest magistrate or police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. a police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. in the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself.....

Judgment:

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>Ainslie, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 0
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Ainslie, J.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>Ainslie, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 1
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>Ainslie, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 2
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '851056',
			'acts' => '',
			'appealno' => '',
			'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'authreffered' => '',
			'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
			'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => '',
			'citingcases' => '',
			'counselplain' => '',
			'counseldef' => '',
			'court' => 'Kolkata',
			'court_type' => 'PC',
			'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
			'deposition' => '',
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
			'judgement' => '<p style="text-align: justify;">Ainslie, J.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p style="text-align: justify;">2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p style="text-align: justify;"></p><p style="text-align: justify;">',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => '',
			'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
			'ratiodecidendi' => '',
			'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
			'sub' => 'Criminal',
			'link' => null,
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '851056',
		(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'The Empress and Vs Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Citation 851056 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '851056',
		'acts' => '',
		'appealno' => '',
		'appellant' => 'The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'authreffered' => '',
		'casename' => 'The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty',
		'casenote' => 'Criminal Procedure Code (Act X of 1872), Section 90 - Omission to give information to Police of offence. - ',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => '',
		'citingcases' => '',
		'counselplain' => '',
		'counseldef' => '',
		'court' => 'Kolkata',
		'court_type' => 'PC',
		'decidedon' => '1877-12-18',
		'deposition' => '',
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => 'Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.',
		'judgement' => '<p>Ainslie, J.</p><p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.</p><p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p></p><p>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => '',
		'pubs' => '(1879)ILR4Cal623',
		'ratiodecidendi' => '',
		'respondent' => 'Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;',
		'sub' => 'Criminal',
		'link' => null,
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '851056',
	(int) 1 => 'empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/851056/empress-vs-sashi-bhusan-chuckrabutty'
$ctype = ''
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<p>Ainslie, J.',
	(int) 1 => '<p>1. The provisions of Section 90 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 176 of the Indian Penal Code ought not to be used for purposes of vexation, but in order to secure due information to Magistrates and the Police of offences committed within their jurisdiction: Provided that information is conveyed to the nearest Magistrate or Police officer by one of the parties bound to give such information; it is not reasonable that every other person who may possibly be bound to give information should be prosecuted for not having done so. A Police officer is not better off when he has half-a-dozen copies of the same report than when he has the first. In the present instance it appears as a matter of fact, from the record which has come up to us, that the petitioner did not himself get any information regarding the theft until the fourth day after its occurrence, and that, in the meantime, an account of the theft had been duly reported to the Police by another gomashta and a punch of the village. Under these circumstances, there was nothing to be gained by further information being given. All that the law intended to secure, namely, that these matters should not be concealed, had been secured. And in our opinion the present prosecution was unreasonable.',
	(int) 2 => '<p>2. The Deputy Magistrate has passed a sentence, which Section 176 of the Penal Code does not admit of being passed. We, therefore, set aside the sentence passed, and we think that, under the circumstances of the case, it is not necessary to substitute any other for it. The accused will be discharged.<p>',
	(int) 3 => '<p>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 4
$i = (int) 3
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Subject	Criminal
Court	Kolkata
Decided On	Dec-18-1877
Judge	Ainslie and ;Broughton, JJ.
Reported in	(1879)ILR4Cal623
Appellant	The Empress and ;In Re: in the Matter of the Petition of Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty
Respondent	Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty;

The Empress and Vs. Sashi Bhusan Chuckrabutty - Court Judgment