Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment

Judgment:

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 0
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
U.S. Supreme Court Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)

Scarborough v. Pargoud

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 1
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Decided May 7, 1883

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 2
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

108 U.S. 567

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 3
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 4
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

I N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 5
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 6
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Syllabus

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 7
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 8
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 9
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 10
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 11
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Page 108 U. S. 568

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 12
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Cummings v. Jones, 104 U. S. 419 . In Brooks v. Norris, 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 13
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

"The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 14
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

This case is cited with approval in Mussina v. Cavazos, 6 Wall. 355.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 15
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 16
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

The writ is dismissed.

Notice (8): Undefined variable: query [APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144]Code Context                                         echo $this->Adsense->display('responsive_rect'); 

                                        }

                                        echo html_entity_decode($this->Wand->highlight($content[$i], $query));
$viewFile = '/home/legalcrystal/app/View/Case/amp.ctp'
$dataForView = array(
	'title_for_layout' => 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | ',
	'desc' => array(
		'Judgement' => array(
			'id' => '84501',
			'acts' => null,
			'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
			'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
			'authreffered' => null,
			'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
			'casenote' => '',
			'caseanalysis' => null,
			'casesref' => null,
			'citingcases' => null,
			'counselplain' => null,
			'counseldef' => null,
			'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
			'court_type' => 'FN',
			'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
			'deposition' => null,
			'favorof' => null,
			'findings' => null,
			'judge' => null,
			'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a class="page-number" id="568">
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a href="/case/84148/cummings-vs-jones">
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/80222/brooks-vs-norris">
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a href="/case/81530/mussina-vs-cavazos">
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
			'observations' => null,
			'overruledby' => null,
			'prhistory' => null,
			'pubs' => null,
			'ratiodecidendi' => null,
			'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
			'sub' => null,
			'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
			'circuit' => null
		)
	),
	'casename_url' => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud',
	'args' => array(
		(int) 0 => '84501',
		(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
	)
)
$title_for_layout = 'Scarborough Vs Pargoud - Citation 84501 - Court Judgment | '
$desc = array(
	'Judgement' => array(
		'id' => '84501',
		'acts' => null,
		'appealno' => '108 U.S. 567',
		'appellant' => 'Scarborough',
		'authreffered' => null,
		'casename' => 'Scarborough Vs. Pargoud',
		'casenote' => '',
		'caseanalysis' => null,
		'casesref' => null,
		'citingcases' => null,
		'counselplain' => null,
		'counseldef' => null,
		'court' => 'US Supreme Court',
		'court_type' => 'FN',
		'decidedon' => '1883-05-07',
		'deposition' => null,
		'favorof' => null,
		'findings' => null,
		'judge' => null,
		'judgement' => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
</p>
<p>
<b>
</b>
</p>
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
</p>
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
</p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 </p>
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 </p>
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 </p>
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 </p>
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
</p>
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 </p>
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 </p>
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 </p>
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 </p>
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
</p>
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>',
		'observations' => null,
		'overruledby' => null,
		'prhistory' => null,
		'pubs' => null,
		'ratiodecidendi' => null,
		'respondent' => 'Pargoud',
		'sub' => null,
		'link' => '/cases/federal/us/108/567/',
		'circuit' => null
	)
)
$casename_url = 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$args = array(
	(int) 0 => '84501',
	(int) 1 => 'scarborough-vs-pargoud'
)
$url = 'https://sooperkanoon.com/case/amp/84501/scarborough-vs-pargoud'
$ctype = ''
$date = array(
	(int) 0 => 'May',
	(int) 1 => '07',
	(int) 2 => '1883'
)
$content = array(
	(int) 0 => '<html><head></head><body><div>


 Scarborough v. Pargoud - 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
<br/>
<span>

 U.S. Supreme Court
 

 Scarborough v. Pargoud, 108 U.S. 567 (1883)
 
</span>

<p>
<b>
 Scarborough v. Pargoud
 </b>
',
	(int) 1 => '
<p>
<b>
 Decided May 7, 1883
 </b>
',
	(int) 2 => '
<p>
<b>
 108 U.S. 567
 </b>
',
	(int) 3 => '
<p>
<b>
</b>
',
	(int) 4 => '
<p>

 I
 
 N ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT
 ',
	(int) 5 => '
<p>
<em>
 OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA
 </em>
',
	(int) 6 => '
<p>
<em>
</em>
<em>
 Syllabus
 </em>
',
	(int) 7 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is filed in the court which rendered the judgment within two years from the entry of the judgment.
 ',
	(int) 8 => '
<p>
 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
 ',
	(int) 9 => '
<p>
 The final decree in this case was rendered on the 13th of July, 1878, and while the writ of error was allowed by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, and a bond approved and citation signed on the 5th of July, 1880, the writ of error was not actually issued until the 14th, and the copy was not lodged in the clerk's office until the 16th, of that month.
 ',
	(int) 10 => '
<p>
 No judgment or decree of a state court can be reviewed in this Court unless the writ of error is brought within two years after the entry of the judgment. Rev.Stat. § 1008;
 ',
	(int) 11 => '
<p>
<a>
 Page 108 U. S. 568
 </a>
',
	(int) 12 => '
<p>
<em>
 Cummings v. Jones,
 </em>
<span>
<a>
 104 U. S. 419
 </a>
</span>
 . In
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Brooks v. Norris,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 11 How. 204, it was decided, Chief Justice Taney, speaking for the Court, that
 ',
	(int) 13 => '
<p>
 "The writ of error is not brought, in the legal meaning of the term, until it is filed in the court which rendered the judgment. It is the filing of the writ that removes the record from the inferior to the appellate court, and the period of limitation prescribed by the act of congress must be calculated accordingly."
 ',
	(int) 14 => '
<p>
 This case is cited with approval in
 <em>
<span>
<a>
 Mussina v. Cavazos,
 </a>
</span>
</em>
 6 Wall. 355.
 ',
	(int) 15 => '
<p>
 It follows that the writ of error in this case was not brought within the time limited by law, and we have consequently no jurisdiction. For that reason,
 ',
	(int) 16 => '
<p>
<em>
 The writ is dismissed.
 </em>
',
	(int) 17 => '
<br/>
<br/>
</div></body></html>'
)
$paragraphAfter = (int) 1
$cnt = (int) 18
$i = (int) 17
include - APP/View/Case/amp.ctp, line 144
View::_evaluate() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 971
View::_render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 933
View::render() - CORE/Cake/View/View.php, line 473
Controller::render() - CORE/Cake/Controller/Controller.php, line 963
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 200
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/Cake/Routing/Dispatcher.php, line 167
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 109

Court	US Supreme Court
Decided On	May-07-1883
Case Number	108 U.S. 567
Appellant	Scarborough
Respondent	Pargoud

Scarborough Vs. Pargoud - Court Judgment