Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Harichand - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
- order1. leave granted.2. none appears for the respondent, though served.3. in the present case, prima facie, we find this to be a case of evasion of tax as the assessee carried the goods in a manner by which he was able to avoid the check post. this question has not been decided by the high court. the high court dismissed the revision saying that no question of law arises. we have passed several orders criticizing the manner of disposal of tax revisions by the high court in a perfunctory manner.4. for the afore-stated reasons, we set aside the impugned order and remit the matter to the high court for de novo consideration in accordance with law.5. civil appeal is, accordingly, allowed with no order as to costs.

Judgment:
ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. None appears for the respondent, though served.

3. In the present case, prima facie, we find this to be a case of evasion of tax as the assessee carried the goods in a manner by which he was able to avoid the check post. This question has not been decided by the High Court. The High Court dismissed the Revision saying that no question of law arises. We have passed several orders criticizing the manner of disposal of Tax Revisions by the High Court in a perfunctory manner.

4. For the afore-stated reasons, we set aside the impugned order and remit the matter to the High Court for de novo consideration in accordance with law.

5. Civil appeal is, accordingly, allowed with no order as to costs.